These reforms aim to boost economic competitiveness and flexibility by reducing regulatory burdens, fostering job creation and business growth.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Minimum Wage Policy |
Basic minimum wage
|
No minimum wage
|
|
| 2 | Maximum Working Hours |
40-hour weekly maximum with overtime controls
|
48-hour weekly maximum
|
|
| 3 | Paid Annual Leave |
6+ weeks statutory paid leave
|
~4 weeks statutory paid leave
|
|
| 4 | Paid Sick Leave |
Employers must pay statutory sick pay
|
Unpaid but job-protected sick leave
|
|
| 5 | Price-Gouging Regulation |
Temporary price caps on essentials in declared emergencies
|
Sellers must justify large price rises publicly; no caps
|
Party
A movement for economic freedom, smaller government, and individual initiative. We champion free markets, lower taxes, and personal responsibility. Inspired by the conviction that prosperity comes from people, not the state. No compromise, no retreat, no turning back!
Core pillars
Activist · Age 25
From viral debates to sold-out rallies, Malcolm Vaughan leverages his celebrity status and sharp intellect to mobilize young voters, embodying both the movement's modern appeal and its unwavering principles.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 29 / 100 seats (29.0%)
Against: 71 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 19 | No | This measures will only serve to starve workers. We need balance and cooperation between workers and the National elites, not a struggle between them. |
| Distributists | 10 | No | Why on earth would we get rid of minimum wage |
| Freedom Alliance | 11 | No | What a shame to propose the two first laws. We have to protect the workers. |
| Frente De Izquierda Y Trabajadores | 2 | No | no, por que habría ¿que eliminar el salario mínimo? |
| New Morning Movement Proposer | 29 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 29 | No | We cannot support abolishing the minimum wage, or reducing leave |
For: 58 / 200 seats (29.0%)
Against: 142 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 38 | No | This measures will only serve to starve workers. We need balance and cooperation between workers and the National elites, not a struggle between them. |
| Distributists | 20 | No | Why on earth would we get rid of minimum wage |
| Freedom Alliance | 22 | No | What a shame to propose the two first laws. We have to protect the workers. |
| Frente De Izquierda Y Trabajadores | 4 | No | no, por que habría ¿que eliminar el salario mínimo? |
| New Morning Movement Proposer | 58 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 58 | No | We cannot support abolishing the minimum wage, or reducing leave |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Hill Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“no, por que habría ¿que eliminar el salario mínimo?”
“Why on earth would we get rid of minimum wage”
“What a shame to propose the two first laws. We have to protect the workers.”
“We cannot support abolishing the minimum wage, or reducing leave”
“This measures will only serve to starve workers. We need balance and cooperation between workers and the National elites, not a struggle between them.”