Light-touch regulation preserves open internet access while targeting only serious crimes, boosting innovation and user trust.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Internet Freedom |
Moderate regulation (illegal content removed; platforms must verify age; data rules enforced)
|
Light-touch regulation (net neutrality; limited takedown orders for serious crime only)
|
Party
The UWF was founded on the 14th October 2021 by Disgruntled workers, who where tired of the governement and their inaction, especially against the terrible debt, welfare cuts, and the ignorance of the workers, The UWF is, hoping for a Worker's Democracy to Shine, And maximize liberal freedom
Core pillars
Activist · Age 58
A former car salesman turned firebrand orator, his decades of selling dreams to the working class now fuel his rallies, where his magnetic charm and sharp wit turn skepticism into solidarity.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 66 / 100 seats (66.0%)
Against: 32 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 2
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 32 | No | Crime must be taken seriously and the internet must not be a lawless land by allowing an exception of this logical view. Rules must be enforced, illegal content removed, and age verified to guarantee the safety of users. |
| Libertarian Congress | 32 | Yes | We like this obviously |
| New Morning Movement | 16 | Yes | Government does not create prosperity, people do. Every takedown order, every mandatory verification scheme, every layer of "moderate regulation" is another brick in a wall between citizens and the free exchange of ideas that built the modern economy. We did not get here by asking permission from the state, we got here by trusting individuals, innovators, and entrepreneurs to build what bureaucrats never could. Light-touch regulation is not the absence of responsibility it is the presence of trust. Net neutrality keeps the playing field open for the next generation of builders. Limiting takedown orders to serious crime ensures the state does what it must, and nothing more. This is not deregulation for its own sake. It is the conviction that freedom, not control, is what makes a nation strong, prosperous, and free. We urge every chamber to vote for innovation, for trust, and for the people who built this network not the ones who wish to police it. |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 5 | Yes | No speech should be regulated . |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front | 0 | Yes | We support this great bill! |
| The United Workers Front Proposer | 13 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 130 / 200 seats (65.0%)
Against: 65 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 5
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 65 | No | Crime must be taken seriously and the internet must not be a lawless land by allowing an exception of this logical view. Rules must be enforced, illegal content removed, and age verified to guarantee the safety of users. |
| Libertarian Congress | 63 | Yes | We like this obviously |
| New Morning Movement | 32 | Yes | Government does not create prosperity, people do. Every takedown order, every mandatory verification scheme, every layer of "moderate regulation" is another brick in a wall between citizens and the free exchange of ideas that built the modern economy. We did not get here by asking permission from the state, we got here by trusting individuals, innovators, and entrepreneurs to build what bureaucrats never could. Light-touch regulation is not the absence of responsibility it is the presence of trust. Net neutrality keeps the playing field open for the next generation of builders. Limiting takedown orders to serious crime ensures the state does what it must, and nothing more. This is not deregulation for its own sake. It is the conviction that freedom, not control, is what makes a nation strong, prosperous, and free. We urge every chamber to vote for innovation, for trust, and for the people who built this network not the ones who wish to police it. |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 9 | Yes | No speech should be regulated . |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front | 0 | Yes | We support this great bill! |
| The United Workers Front Proposer | 26 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“No speech should be regulated .”
“Crime must be taken seriously and the internet must not be a lawless land by allowing an exception of this logical view. Rules must be enforced, illegal content removed, and age verified to guarantee the safety of users.”
“Government does not create prosperity, people do. Every takedown order, every mandatory verification scheme, every layer of "moderate regulation" is another brick in a wall between citizens and the free exchange of ideas that built the modern economy. We did not get here by asking permission from the state, we got here by trusting individuals, innovators, and entrepreneurs to build what bureaucrats never could. Light-touch regulation is not the absence of responsibility it is the presence of trust. Net neutrality keeps the playing field open for the next generation of builders. Limiting takedown orders to serious crime ensures the state does what it must, and nothing more. This is not deregulation for its own sake. It is the conviction that freedom, not control, is what makes a nation strong, prosperous, and free. We urge every chamber to vote for innovation, for trust, and for the people who built this network not the ones who wish to police it.”
“We support this great bill!”
“We like this obviously”