These changes ensure universal healthcare, mental health equity, public health protection, herd immunity, and urgent housing solutions—prioritizing collective well-being over profit and delay.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Healthcare System Model |
Public system with private top-ups
|
Single public system, free at point of use
|
|
| 2 | Mental Health Provision |
Expanded but not guaranteed access
|
Legal right to timely mental-health care
|
|
| 3 | Public Health & Nutrition |
Labelling and ad limits for children
|
Bans on junk-food ads, mandatory reformulation
|
|
| 4 | Vaccination Policy |
Mandatory with medical/conscience exemptions
|
Mandatory, no exemptions
|
|
| 5 | Housing Supply & Planning |
Strong national housing targets
|
Override local objections, build at scale
|
Party
The Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front champions the peasantry over the urban elite, waging protracted people's war against imperialism and bureaucratic corruption. We reject Soviet-style centralism, trusting instead in mass mobilization, national self-reliance, and armed revolutionary struggle.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 47
A former investigative journalist turned firebrand politician, Edmund Harrington leveraged his media savvy to expose corruption before becoming the party’s most commanding orator, his loyalty to the leadership unshaken by years of public battles.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 71 / 100 seats (71.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 29
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 17 | Yes | Given the well know effects of a poor national health on national security and well being, we support this bill to adress such question. Furthermore, we understand that the State should reserve the right to build housing units where needed, as part of a broader policy to counter the effects of manipulative practices in the market and of homelessness. |
| Radical Republican Union | 0 | Abstain | We support some of these measures, but find this bill overal too radical and financially risky, therefore we will not partake in it's adoption. |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front Proposer | 42 | Yes | No reason given |
| The United Workers Front | 12 | Yes | We are in favour of this bill, even radical, somewhat decent |
For: 142 / 200 seats (71.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 58
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 34 | Yes | Given the well know effects of a poor national health on national security and well being, we support this bill to adress such question. Furthermore, we understand that the State should reserve the right to build housing units where needed, as part of a broader policy to counter the effects of manipulative practices in the market and of homelessness. |
| Radical Republican Union | 0 | Abstain | We support some of these measures, but find this bill overal too radical and financially risky, therefore we will not partake in it's adoption. |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front Proposer | 84 | Yes | No reason given |
| The United Workers Front | 24 | Yes | We are in favour of this bill, even radical, somewhat decent |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We support some of these measures, but find this bill overal too radical and financially risky, therefore we will not partake in it's adoption.”
“Given the well know effects of a poor national health on national security and well being, we support this bill to adress such question. Furthermore, we understand that the State should reserve the right to build housing units where needed, as part of a broader policy to counter the effects of manipulative practices in the market and of homelessness.”
“We are in favour of this bill, even radical, somewhat decent”