Free Market Reform Act of 2023 - Drumagh

Rationale

These changes will reduce government burden, encourage personal responsibility, and stimulate economic growth through market competition.

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous	Proposed
1	Public Ownership of Key Industries	Nationalise all key utilities and transport	Full privatisation, market discipline
2	Right to Strike	Unrestricted right to strike, incl. solidarity action	Strikes effectively banned
3	Trade Union Rights	Full collective bargaining and strike rights	Trade unions illegal; organizers face imprisonment
4	Social Care for the Elderly	Free universal social care	Care is the family's responsibility
5	Welfare Conditionality	Mandatory work-for-benefits	Strict time limits on benefits

1

Public Ownership of Key Industries

Previous law

Nationalise all key utilities and transport

Full privatisation, market discipline

2

Right to Strike

Previous law

Unrestricted right to strike, incl. solidarity action

Strikes effectively banned

3

Trade Union Rights

Previous law

Full collective bargaining and strike rights

Trade unions illegal; organizers face imprisonment

4

Social Care for the Elderly

Previous law

Free universal social care

Care is the family's responsibility

5

Welfare Conditionality

Previous law

Mandatory work-for-benefits

Strict time limits on benefits

Proposer

Party

New Morning Movement

A movement for economic freedom, smaller government, and individual initiative. We champion free markets, lower taxes, and personal responsibility. Inspired by the conviction that prosperity comes from people, not the state. No compromise, no retreat, no turning back!

Core pillars

TH

Thomas Hill

Candidate for First Citizen · Age 41

279,683 social followers

A former soldier turned firebrand provocateur, Thomas Hill’s explosive charisma and radical zeal electrify crowds, blending street-smart instincts with a reputation as a man of action.

⭐ Celebrity ✨ Charismatic 🎖️ Former Military 🏙️ Street Smart 🔥 Firebrand

Timeline

Draft

7 January 2023
Vote Open

7 January 2023
Vote Closed

8 March 2023
Did Not Become Law

8 March 2023

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

First Council of Ministers

Failed

48Yes 50No 2Not voted 100 seats

For: 48 / 100 seats (48.0%)

Against: 50 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 2

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 49.0%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Centralist Unity	32	No	We can not support a bill which result is inevitably the destruction of workers power to demand better conditions, because if we destroy workers power to demand better conditions we are allowing the elites to run the economy without criticism from labor. If we allow the elites to run the economy without criticism from labor we are allowing the elites to grow lazy and complacent, and if we allow the elites to become lazy and complacent then we are allowing Drumagh's production to stagnate and turn weak.
Libertarian Congress	32	Yes	We love this keep it up
New Morning Movement Proposer	16	Yes	No reason given
Progressive Democratic Union	5	No	This Proposal would effectively curb the liberties of workers to negotiate with Business Owners, while we agree the current laws should be reformed, this Reformation would be worse than current laws
The United Workers Front	13	No	We cant accept this ! it will return the privileges to the rich and harm the workers

The People’s Assembly

Failed

95Yes 100No 5Not voted 200 seats

For: 95 / 200 seats (47.5%)

Against: 100 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 5

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 48.7%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Centralist Unity	65	No	We can not support a bill which result is inevitably the destruction of workers power to demand better conditions, because if we destroy workers power to demand better conditions we are allowing the elites to run the economy without criticism from labor. If we allow the elites to run the economy without criticism from labor we are allowing the elites to grow lazy and complacent, and if we allow the elites to become lazy and complacent then we are allowing Drumagh's production to stagnate and turn weak.
Libertarian Congress	63	Yes	We love this keep it up
New Morning Movement Proposer	32	Yes	No reason given
Progressive Democratic Union	9	No	This Proposal would effectively curb the liberties of workers to negotiate with Business Owners, while we agree the current laws should be reformed, this Reformation would be worse than current laws
The United Workers Front	26	No	We cant accept this ! it will return the privileges to the rich and harm the workers

First Citizen

Failed

0Yes 1No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)

Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Centralist Unity	1	No	No reason given

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

Centralist Unity

Voted Feb. 20, 2023

No

“We can not support a bill which result is inevitably the destruction of workers power to demand better conditions, because if we destroy workers power to demand better conditions we are allowing the elites to run the economy without criticism from labor. If we allow the elites to run the economy without criticism from labor we are allowing the elites to grow lazy and complacent, and if we allow the elites to become lazy and complacent then we are allowing Drumagh's production to stagnate and turn weak.”

Libertarian Congress

Voted Jan. 17, 2023

Yes

“We love this keep it up”

The United Workers Front

Voted Jan. 12, 2023

No

“We cant accept this ! it will return the privileges to the rich and harm the workers”

Progressive Democratic Union

Voted Jan. 10, 2023

No

“This Proposal would effectively curb the liberties of workers to negotiate with Business Owners, while we agree the current laws should be reformed, this Reformation would be worse than current laws”