These changes promote flexibility in school choice, strengthen environmental protection, and support workforce sustainability for broader public benefit.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | School Selection |
Comprehensive, no selection
|
Some selective schools
|
|
| 2 | Land Conservation & Rewilding |
Balanced land use
|
Expand protected areas
|
|
| 3 | Retirement Age Policy |
Retirement at 70
|
Retirement at 65
|
Party
The Democratic Workers Party is a centrist, worker-oriented party committed to building a strong, prosperous and democratic society. We believe that education, modern infrastructure and secure employment are the foundations of long-term national progress.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 40
A polished former banker turned fiery orator, Francis combines academic rigor with media savvy, using his silver tongue to rally crowds while fiercely defending the party’s vision.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 31 / 100 seats (31.0%)
Against: 39 · Abstained: 29 · Not voted: 1
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 23 | Yes | Although we believe that attention is needed for a reasonable expansion of protected areas, we see no reason to oppose this bill given the proven success of the NEDB and the need for promoting merit across society. |
| Libertarian Congress | 21 | No | We like 1 but 2 and 3 we disagree with |
| New Morning Movement | 18 | No | We can't support this bill |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 29 | Abstain | Art. 2 is not what we need rn |
| The Democratic Workersparty Proposer | 8 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 63 / 200 seats (31.5%)
Against: 77 · Abstained: 58 · Not voted: 2
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 46 | Yes | Although we believe that attention is needed for a reasonable expansion of protected areas, we see no reason to oppose this bill given the proven success of the NEDB and the need for promoting merit across society. |
| Libertarian Congress | 41 | No | We like 1 but 2 and 3 we disagree with |
| New Morning Movement | 36 | No | We can't support this bill |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 58 | Abstain | Art. 2 is not what we need rn |
| The Democratic Workersparty Proposer | 17 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Libertarian Congress | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We can't support this bill”
“Although we believe that attention is needed for a reasonable expansion of protected areas, we see no reason to oppose this bill given the proven success of the NEDB and the need for promoting merit across society.”
“Art. 2 is not what we need rn”
“We like 1 but 2 and 3 we disagree with”