“We support this proposal”
Economic Modernization And Reform Act of 2022
Rationale
These changes modernize outdated policies to boost innovation, economic growth, and worker rights while ensuring flexible, balanced regulations that serve the public interest.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Automation & the Workforce |
Ban automation that displaces workers; robot levy
|
Market-led automation
|
|
| 2 | AI Development & Safety |
Strict licensing, safety audits, liability
|
Light-touch, pro-innovation
|
|
| 3 | Banking & Financial Regulation |
Capital controls, separated retail/investment banking
|
Strong prudential oversight
|
|
| 4 | Foreign Land Ownership |
Abolish all private land ownership; all land held by the state
|
Foreign ownership limited to commercial property only; residential banned
|
|
| 5 | Trade Union Rights |
All enterprises must be majority worker-owned cooperatives
|
Full collective bargaining and strike rights
|
1
Automation & the Workforce2
AI Development & Safety3
Banking & Financial Regulation4
Foreign Land Ownership5
Trade Union RightsProposer
Party
Centralist Unity
Centralist Unity forges a nation of order and strength! We will restore the authority of the central government and bring back the glory and prosperity that has been robbed from our motherland.
Core pillars
Theodore Thompson
First Citizen · Age 35
A data-driven strategist who rose from a youthful fascination with polling numbers to become an indispensable behind-the-scenes architect of campaign narratives, leveraging his sharp analytical mind and elite connections to shape the party’s message with precision.
Timeline
-
Draft7 November 2022
-
Vote Open7 November 2022
-
Vote Closed6 January 2023
-
Became Law6 January 2023
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
First Council of Ministers
PassedFor: 80 / 100 seats (80.0%)
Against: 5 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 15
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity Proposer | 32 | Yes | No reason given |
| Libertarian Congress | 32 | Yes | It should go further |
| New Democratic Alliance Of Drumagh | 0 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| New Morning Movement | 16 | Yes | We support this bill, but we consider that it does not go far enough to permanently root out socialism from this country. |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 5 | No | We believe the proposed legaslation does not go far enough on achieving a fair and baanced market , we believe that the labor protections codified within this law are too strong . |
| The United Workers Front | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
The People’s Assembly
PassedFor: 160 / 200 seats (80.0%)
Against: 9 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 31
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity Proposer | 65 | Yes | No reason given |
| Libertarian Congress | 63 | Yes | It should go further |
| New Democratic Alliance Of Drumagh | 0 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| New Morning Movement | 32 | Yes | We support this bill, but we consider that it does not go far enough to permanently root out socialism from this country. |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 9 | No | We believe the proposed legaslation does not go far enough on achieving a fair and baanced market , we believe that the labor protections codified within this law are too strong . |
| The United Workers Front | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
First Citizen
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We believe the proposed legaslation does not go far enough on achieving a fair and baanced market , we believe that the labor protections codified within this law are too strong .”
“We support this bill, but we consider that it does not go far enough to permanently root out socialism from this country.”
“It should go further”