These reforms aim to support Drumagh’s recovery by encouraging innovation, automation, domestic energy production, and investment while keeping rent increases tied to inflation to protect housing affordability and stability.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AI Development & Safety |
Light-touch, pro-innovation
|
No restrictions; accelerate AI
|
|
| 2 | Automation & the Workforce |
Market-led automation
|
Actively incentivise automation
|
|
| 3 | Fossil Fuel Extraction |
Managed wind-down
|
Maximise domestic extraction
|
|
| 4 | Rent Control |
Hard caps on rents
|
Rent increases capped to inflation
|
|
| 5 | Banking & Financial Regulation |
Strong prudential oversight
|
Light-touch regulation
|
Party
The Peopleswing party plants freedom in fertile ground and builds bridges to tomorrow. We turn wealth into roads and rights into harvests for every hand that dares.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 31
A former investment banker who walked away from a six-figure salary after witnessing firsthand the predatory lending that trapped Drumagh’s poorest families, now wields her sharp intellect and silver-tongued eloquence to advocate for equitable economic policies with unshakable conviction.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 15 / 100 seats (15.0%)
Against: 80 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 5
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 30 | No | Although we are entirely in favor of economic development and national innovation, we can not support the radicality of Article 1. |
| Radical Republican Union | 28 | No | Allthough we support partial economic liberalisation, and articles 5, we cannot vote for this bill given the radicality of the changes it would bring. Especially, switching from regulation of banking to light regulations over night could induce economical chaos and speculation, triggering inflation. We also believe that automation would hurt the workers and trigger massive unemployment, as well as industrial exodus. As for AI, it shall remain in check due to it's dangerous, yet promising, potential. Unregulated AI could lead to massive structural issues, such as unemployment, and severe data breaches or other cybersecurity issues. |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front | 22 | No | This is not recovery, it is capitulation to capital. Deregulating banking into light-touch oversight abandons the working class to the same financial recklessness that caused crisis after crisis. Removing all restrictions on AI hands unchecked power over production and surveillance to corporations, with no protection for workers whose labour it will replace. Actively incentivising automation without redistributing its gains means profits for owners, unemployment for the people. Maximising fossil fuel extraction betrays both the environment and the principle that natural resources belong to the collective, not to extractive industry. And weakening rent control, hard caps replaced by mere inflation-linked increases, opens the door to landlords squeezing tenants under the cover of stability. Every article in this bill serves capital, not the people. The Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front will not vote to accelerate exploitation, deregulation, and extraction dressed up as progress. |
| peopleswing Proposer | 15 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 30 / 200 seats (15.0%)
Against: 159 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 11
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 60 | No | Although we are entirely in favor of economic development and national innovation, we can not support the radicality of Article 1. |
| Radical Republican Union | 55 | No | Allthough we support partial economic liberalisation, and articles 5, we cannot vote for this bill given the radicality of the changes it would bring. Especially, switching from regulation of banking to light regulations over night could induce economical chaos and speculation, triggering inflation. We also believe that automation would hurt the workers and trigger massive unemployment, as well as industrial exodus. As for AI, it shall remain in check due to it's dangerous, yet promising, potential. Unregulated AI could lead to massive structural issues, such as unemployment, and severe data breaches or other cybersecurity issues. |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front | 44 | No | This is not recovery, it is capitulation to capital. Deregulating banking into light-touch oversight abandons the working class to the same financial recklessness that caused crisis after crisis. Removing all restrictions on AI hands unchecked power over production and surveillance to corporations, with no protection for workers whose labour it will replace. Actively incentivising automation without redistributing its gains means profits for owners, unemployment for the people. Maximising fossil fuel extraction betrays both the environment and the principle that natural resources belong to the collective, not to extractive industry. And weakening rent control, hard caps replaced by mere inflation-linked increases, opens the door to landlords squeezing tenants under the cover of stability. Every article in this bill serves capital, not the people. The Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front will not vote to accelerate exploitation, deregulation, and extraction dressed up as progress. |
| peopleswing Proposer | 30 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Although we are entirely in favor of economic development and national innovation, we can not support the radicality of Article 1.”
“Allthough we support partial economic liberalisation, and articles 5, we cannot vote for this bill given the radicality of the changes it would bring. Especially, switching from regulation of banking to light regulations over night could induce economical chaos and speculation, triggering inflation. We also believe that automation would hurt the workers and trigger massive unemployment, as well as industrial exodus. As for AI, it shall remain in check due to it's dangerous, yet promising, potential. Unregulated AI could lead to massive structural issues, such as unemployment, and severe data breaches or other cybersecurity issues.”
“This is not recovery, it is capitulation to capital. Deregulating banking into light-touch oversight abandons the working class to the same financial recklessness that caused crisis after crisis. Removing all restrictions on AI hands unchecked power over production and surveillance to corporations, with no protection for workers whose labour it will replace. Actively incentivising automation without redistributing its gains means profits for owners, unemployment for the people. Maximising fossil fuel extraction betrays both the environment and the principle that natural resources belong to the collective, not to extractive industry. And weakening rent control, hard caps replaced by mere inflation-linked increases, opens the door to landlords squeezing tenants under the cover of stability. Every article in this bill serves capital, not the people. The Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front will not vote to accelerate exploitation, deregulation, and extraction dressed up as progress.”