“yes we beleive this bill is geat”
Digital Freedom And Accountability Act of 2022
Rationale
These changes prioritise public safety and democratic rights over unchecked tech growth, addressing rising harms from AI, job losses, censorship, and online abuse while protecting free speech and press freedom.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Media Censorship Policy |
Targeted regulation (post-publication fines for incitement/defamation; independent regulator)
|
Free press (no prior restraints; narrow limits for direct incitement only)
|
|
| 2 | Online Safety & Social Media |
Targeted child-safety duties
|
Minimal duties, free-speech priority
|
|
| 3 | AI Development & Safety |
Light-touch, pro-innovation
|
Strict licensing, safety audits, liability
|
|
| 4 | Automation & the Workforce |
Market-led automation
|
Ban automation that displaces workers; robot levy
|
|
| 5 | Press Regulation |
State-recognised self-regulation
|
No press regulation at all
|
1
Media Censorship Policy2
Online Safety & Social Media3
AI Development & Safety4
Automation & the Workforce5
Press RegulationProposer
Party
Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front
The Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front champions the peasantry over the urban elite, waging protracted people's war against imperialism and bureaucratic corruption. We reject Soviet-style centralism, trusting instead in mass mobilization, national self-reliance, and armed revolutionary struggle.
Core pillars
Edmund Harrington
Activist · Age 47
A former investigative journalist turned firebrand politician, Edmund Harrington leveraged his media savvy to expose corruption before becoming the party’s most commanding orator, his loyalty to the leadership unshaken by years of public battles.
Timeline
-
Draft19 July 2022
-
Vote Open19 July 2022
-
Vote Closed17 September 2022
-
Became Law17 September 2022
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
First Council of Ministers
PassedFor: 39 / 100 seats (39.0%)
Against: 28 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 33
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Progressive Congress | 0 | No | Beacause our party cant support this law changing beacause you can see how can we stop censorship thats unfair But i support the socialist agenda for free press but apart from it we can’t support anything |
| Libertarian Congress | 28 | No | We love the press and Internet stuff but dislike the automation and ai side. |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front Proposer | 23 | Yes | No reason given |
| The United Workers Front | 16 | Yes | yes we beleive this bill is geat |
The People’s Assembly
PassedFor: 77 / 200 seats (38.5%)
Against: 56 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 67
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Progressive Congress | 0 | No | Beacause our party cant support this law changing beacause you can see how can we stop censorship thats unfair But i support the socialist agenda for free press but apart from it we can’t support anything |
| Libertarian Congress | 56 | No | We love the press and Internet stuff but dislike the automation and ai side. |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front Proposer | 45 | Yes | No reason given |
| The United Workers Front | 32 | Yes | yes we beleive this bill is geat |
First Citizen
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We love the press and Internet stuff but dislike the automation and ai side.”
“Beacause our party cant support this law changing beacause you can see how can we stop censorship thats unfair But i support the socialist agenda for free press but apart from it we can’t support anything”
“Beacause our party cant support this law changing beacause you can see how can we stop censorship thats unfair”