“si, me parece importante pasar esta ley, mas allá que la primera sea arriesgada la segunda es buena.”
Centralized Emergency Powers And Identity System of 2024
Rationale
Centralising emergency response improves coordination during crises, while voluntary IDs balance security and privacy needs.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Emergency Preparedness |
National framework with regional response teams
|
Fully centralised emergency-response system with powers to requisition property and restrict movement
|
|
| 2 | National Identity Cards |
No national ID card
|
Voluntary ID card
|
1
Emergency Preparedness2
National Identity CardsProposer
Party
Centralist Unity
Centralist Unity forges a nation of order and strength! We will restore the authority of the central government and bring back the glory and prosperity that has been robbed from our motherland.
Core pillars
Sarah Hall
First Minister · Age 25
At 21, Sarah Hall is already a rising star in political circles, blending sharp academic insight with fiery idealism and an uncompromising refusal to bend to political expediency.
Timeline
-
Draft24 August 2024
-
Vote Open24 August 2024
-
Vote Closed23 October 2024
-
Became Law23 October 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
First Council of Ministers
PassedFor: 60 / 100 seats (60.0%)
Against: 29 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 11
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity Proposer | 16 | Yes | No reason given |
| Distributists | 9 | Yes | We agree with both of these |
| Freedom Alliance | 11 | Yes | Even though the first one is risky , the second law is important to us and we want to make breakthrough. |
| Frente De Izquierda Y Trabajadores | 0 | Yes | si, me parece importante pasar esta ley, mas allá que la primera sea arriesgada la segunda es buena. |
| New Morning Movement | 24 | Yes | We support this bill |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 29 | No | We are against more centralization or voluntary IDs |
The People’s Assembly
PassedFor: 120 / 200 seats (60.0%)
Against: 58 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 22
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity Proposer | 33 | Yes | No reason given |
| Distributists | 18 | Yes | We agree with both of these |
| Freedom Alliance | 21 | Yes | Even though the first one is risky , the second law is important to us and we want to make breakthrough. |
| Frente De Izquierda Y Trabajadores | 0 | Yes | si, me parece importante pasar esta ley, mas allá que la primera sea arriesgada la segunda es buena. |
| New Morning Movement | 48 | Yes | We support this bill |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 58 | No | We are against more centralization or voluntary IDs |
First Citizen
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Hill | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We are against more centralization or voluntary IDs”
“We support this bill”
“Even though the first one is risky , the second law is important to us and we want to make breakthrough.”
“We agree with both of these”