To strengthen national unity by ensuring consistent language use in public institutions and education, reducing confusion and administrative inefficiencies.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Official Language Policy |
Single official language for all official documents and courts
|
Ban other languages in schools and government services
|
Party
Centralist Unity forges a nation of order and strength! We will restore the authority of the central government and bring back the glory and prosperity that has been robbed from our motherland.
Core pillars
Minister of Health & Human Services · Age 25
At 21, Sarah Hall is already a rising star in political circles, blending sharp academic insight with fiery idealism and an uncompromising refusal to bend to political expediency.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 59 / 100 seats (59.0%)
Against: 33 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 8
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity Proposer | 17 | Yes | No reason given |
| Libertarian Congress | 0 | No | People should have the freedom to speak any languge |
| Radical Republican Union | 21 | No | We strongly oppose this measure, which constitutes an infringement of the fundamental freedoms of citizens and pupils in our state schools. We consider the ban on non-national languages – whether regional dialects or languages of foreign origin – in the civil service to be excessive. This is not a matter of the language used by the administration, but of the language spoken by individuals who have a right to preserve their linguistic heritage. |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front | 42 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| The United Workers Front | 12 | No | This bill is pro-supremacist, and is very bad, VOTE NO |
For: 118 / 200 seats (59.0%)
Against: 66 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 16
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity Proposer | 34 | Yes | No reason given |
| Libertarian Congress | 0 | No | People should have the freedom to speak any languge |
| Radical Republican Union | 42 | No | We strongly oppose this measure, which constitutes an infringement of the fundamental freedoms of citizens and pupils in our state schools. We consider the ban on non-national languages – whether regional dialects or languages of foreign origin – in the civil service to be excessive. This is not a matter of the language used by the administration, but of the language spoken by individuals who have a right to preserve their linguistic heritage. |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front | 84 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| The United Workers Front | 24 | No | This bill is pro-supremacist, and is very bad, VOTE NO |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“People should have the freedom to speak any languge”
“We strongly oppose this measure, which constitutes an infringement of the fundamental freedoms of citizens and pupils in our state schools. We consider the ban on non-national languages – whether regional dialects or languages of foreign origin – in the civil service to be excessive. This is not a matter of the language used by the administration, but of the language spoken by individuals who have a right to preserve their linguistic heritage.”
“We support this proposal”
“This bill is pro-supremacist, and is very bad, VOTE NO”