These changes address systemic environmental harm, prioritizing animal welfare, climate action, and ecosystems for public health and future generations.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Animal Welfare Standards |
Regulated farming standards and anti-cruelty laws
|
Strict welfare (ban factory farming; mandatory free-range; fur farming banned)
|
|
| 2 | Fossil Fuel Extraction |
Managed wind-down
|
Immediate ban on all extraction
|
|
| 3 | Hunting & Field Sports |
Licensed, regulated hunting
|
Total ban on hunting for sport
|
|
| 4 | Land Conservation & Rewilding |
Balanced land use
|
Large-scale rewilding and new reserves
|
|
| 5 | Single-Use Plastics |
Phased restrictions and charges
|
Ban single-use plastics outright
|
Party
The Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front champions the peasantry over the urban elite, waging protracted people's war against imperialism and bureaucratic corruption. We reject Soviet-style centralism, trusting instead in mass mobilization, national self-reliance, and armed revolutionary struggle.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 47
A former investigative journalist turned firebrand politician, Edmund Harrington leveraged his media savvy to expose corruption before becoming the party’s most commanding orator, his loyalty to the leadership unshaken by years of public battles.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 23 / 100 seats (23.0%)
Against: 61 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 16
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 33 | No | No to the measures of socialist tyranny. |
| Libertarian Congress | 28 | No | What did you expect? |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front Proposer | 23 | Yes | No reason given |
| The United Workers Front | 0 | Abstain | As An party that prioritises Urban Workers, theese measures are socialist, but enpower the peasants rather than the working class |
For: 45 / 200 seats (22.5%)
Against: 123 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 32
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 67 | No | No to the measures of socialist tyranny. |
| Libertarian Congress | 56 | No | What did you expect? |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front Proposer | 45 | Yes | No reason given |
| The United Workers Front | 0 | Abstain | As An party that prioritises Urban Workers, theese measures are socialist, but enpower the peasants rather than the working class |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“No to the measures of socialist tyranny.”
“As An party that prioritises Urban Workers, theese measures are socialist, but enpower the peasants rather than the working class”
“What did you expect?”