“It's already a mess, let's not add more institutional instability”
Constitutional reform from Distributists of March 2024
Proposed by Distributists in Drumagh
Package Overview (2 measures)
FailedOpening this package cost 90 PP.
What would change
Full constitution with changes markedCurrent wording is shown as it was when voting began.
Elected Offices
Legislatures
Proposer's case
Increases election and Beuracratic changes and their speed
Vote tally
The People’s Assembly
FailedFor: 18 / 200 seats (9.0%) — needs 67.0%
Against: 81 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 101
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 33 | No | We believe it's better to maintain the current arrangement or even to increase terms in order to give governments more room for their agendas. Increasing the size of the FCoM makes no sense as the People's Assembly already exists. |
| Distributists Proposer | 18 | Yes | No reason given |
| New Morning Movement | 48 | No | It's already a mess, let's not add more institutional instability |
First Council of Ministers
FailedFor: 9 / 100 seats (9.0%) — needs 67.0%
Against: 40 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 51
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 16 | No | We believe it's better to maintain the current arrangement or even to increase terms in order to give governments more room for their agendas. Increasing the size of the FCoM makes no sense as the People's Assembly already exists. |
| Distributists Proposer | 9 | Yes | No reason given |
| New Morning Movement | 24 | No | It's already a mess, let's not add more institutional instability |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We believe it's better to maintain the current arrangement or even to increase terms in order to give governments more room for their agendas. Increasing the size of the FCoM makes no sense as the People's Assembly already exists.”