These changes prioritize human dignity and economic resilience by ensuring stable housing, earlier retirement for healthier aging, and lifting people out of poverty with unconditional support.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Homelessness |
Mix of support and enforcement
|
Guaranteed housing-first support
|
|
| 2 | Retirement Age Policy |
Retirement at 60
|
Retirement at 55
|
|
| 3 | Welfare Conditionality |
Light conditions, few sanctions
|
Unconditional benefits
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 37 / 266 seats (13.9%)
Against: 229 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Union | 229 | No | This proposal hurts the economy |
| Revolutionary Socialist Union | 37 | Yes | We definitely support this proposal |
| The Social Democrats Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 54 | Not voted |
For: 91 / 350 seats (26.0%)
Against: 259 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Union | 259 | No | This proposal hurts the economy |
| Revolutionary Socialist Union | 91 | Yes | We definitely support this proposal |
| The Social Democrats Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 80 | Not voted |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This proposal hurts the economy”
“We definitely support this proposal”