“We are against changing the living wage to a maximum wage, which will bring inequality, since there are still wealth gaps even with a limit, so we partially reject this proposal”
Strict Social And Economic Reforms of 2021
Rationale
These changes aim to improve public health, economic fairness, education, environmental sustainability, and juvenile justice by adopting stricter, evidence-based policies for greater societal benefit.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tobacco & Vaping Regulation |
Light regulation (age 18, designated smoking areas, health warnings)
|
Heavy restrictions (plain packaging; indoor ban; age 21; advertising banned)
|
|
| 2 | Minimum Wage Policy |
High living wage
|
Maximum wage cap (no one may earn more than 10x the lowest-paid worker)
|
|
| 3 | Mobile Phones in Schools |
Restricted to break times
|
Left to teacher discretion
|
|
| 4 | Land Conservation & Rewilding |
Expand protected areas
|
Large-scale rewilding and new reserves
|
|
| 5 | Age of Criminal Responsibility |
From 16
|
From 16
|
1
Tobacco & Vaping Regulation2
Minimum Wage Policy3
Mobile Phones in Schools4
Land Conservation & Rewilding5
Age of Criminal ResponsibilityProposer
Party
Middle Alliance
The Middle Alliance stands where freedom blooms and the earth breathes. We build bridges not walls and light the way for generations yet unseen.
Core pillars
Rafael Cruz
Activist · Age 57
A former electrician turned folk singer, Rafael Cruz rose to fame by writing anthems for labor strikes before leveraging his celebrity to turn the party’s working-class base into an unstoppable electoral force.
Timeline
-
Draft24 March 2021
-
Vote Open14 October 2021
-
Vote Closed13 December 2021
-
Did Not Become Law13 December 2021
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senado
FailedFor: 53 / 266 seats (19.9%)
Against: 82 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 131
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Union | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Middle Alliance Proposer | 53 | Yes | No reason given |
| National Democratic Movement | 0 | No | Why set the age of criminal responsibility at 16? We vote against it. |
| National Union Of Costavela | 0 | No | We are against this reforms |
| Revolutionary Socialist Union | 82 | No | We are against changing the living wage to a maximum wage, which will bring inequality, since there are still wealth gaps even with a limit, so we partially reject this proposal |
| Empty seats | 54 | Not voted |
Congress of Deputies
FailedFor: 37 / 350 seats (10.6%)
Against: 148 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 165
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Union | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Middle Alliance Proposer | 37 | Yes | No reason given |
| National Democratic Movement | 0 | No | Why set the age of criminal responsibility at 16? We vote against it. |
| National Union Of Costavela | 0 | No | We are against this reforms |
| Revolutionary Socialist Union | 148 | No | We are against changing the living wage to a maximum wage, which will bring inequality, since there are still wealth gaps even with a limit, so we partially reject this proposal |
| Empty seats | 80 | Not voted |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We are against this reforms”
“We support this proposal”
“Why set the age of criminal responsibility at 16? We vote against it.”