This bill restores public safety, worker productivity, and moral values. We enforce mandatory minimum sentences for repeat offenders, regulate fireworks, limit disruptive strikes, and allow optional religious education to strengthen national cohesion.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trade Union Rights |
Full collective bargaining and strike rights
|
Unions permitted but strikes severely limited (cooling-off periods; binding arbitration)
|
|
| 2 | Religious Education in Schools |
Strictly secular education
|
Optional religious classes
|
|
| 3 | Fireworks |
Freely sold to the public
|
Licensed sale, seasonal limits
|
|
| 4 | Repeat Offender Sentencing |
Judges set sentences case-by-case
|
Escalating mandatory minimums
|
Party
The NDM stands for order, growth, and tradition. We support strong police enforcement, severe legal penalties, and free-market capitalism to unleash national growth. We prioritize economic prosperity and job creation while safeguarding our traditional values and heritage.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 58
A lifelong party stalwart who cut his teeth in street-level campaigns, Raúl García earned unwavering loyalty from the rank-and-file for his sharp political instinct and unshakable belief in the movement’s ideals.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 0 / 266 seats (0.0%)
Against: 266 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Union | 131 | No | This proposal is against the individual freedom |
| Middle Alliance | 53 | No | Same guy , again doing the same stuff he did before |
| National Democratic Movement Proposer | 0 | Yes | Voting YES for stronger public safety, mandatory penalties for repeat offenders, and sustained economic growth. |
| National Union Of Costavela | 0 | Yes | This act modernizes and revitalizes the economy and strengthens the country's security; we are voting for it. |
| Revolutionary Socialist Union | 82 | No | We will never accept taking away workers' rights so that employers can exploit them and prevent them from expressing their grievances and reporting abuses simply because the government doesn't want to, And the other proposals are worthy of a far-right party. Banning fireworks? Why? It simply makes no sense. |
| The United Alliance | 0 | Yes | UA will support this package. Moving from a completely secular education to optional religious lessons gives every pupil and individual greater freedom of choice in their lives. This is something we fully support. As regards penalties for repeat offences, we fully agree with the proposal you have now put forward. Discounts should be found in the supermarket, not in a court of law. |
| Empty seats | 54 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 350 seats (0.0%)
Against: 350 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Union | 165 | No | This proposal is against the individual freedom |
| Middle Alliance | 37 | No | Same guy , again doing the same stuff he did before |
| National Democratic Movement Proposer | 0 | Yes | Voting YES for stronger public safety, mandatory penalties for repeat offenders, and sustained economic growth. |
| National Union Of Costavela | 0 | Yes | This act modernizes and revitalizes the economy and strengthens the country's security; we are voting for it. |
| Revolutionary Socialist Union | 148 | No | We will never accept taking away workers' rights so that employers can exploit them and prevent them from expressing their grievances and reporting abuses simply because the government doesn't want to, And the other proposals are worthy of a far-right party. Banning fireworks? Why? It simply makes no sense. |
| The United Alliance | 0 | Yes | UA will support this package. Moving from a completely secular education to optional religious lessons gives every pupil and individual greater freedom of choice in their lives. This is something we fully support. As regards penalties for repeat offences, we fully agree with the proposal you have now put forward. Discounts should be found in the supermarket, not in a court of law. |
| Empty seats | 80 | Not voted |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This act modernizes and revitalizes the economy and strengthens the country's security; we are voting for it.”
“UA will support this package. Moving from a completely secular education to optional religious lessons gives every pupil and individual greater freedom of choice in their lives. This is something we fully support. As regards penalties for repeat offences, we fully agree with the proposal you have now put forward. Discounts should be found in the supermarket, not in a court of law.”
“Same guy , again doing the same stuff he did before”
“We will never accept taking away workers' rights so that employers can exploit them and prevent them from expressing their grievances and reporting abuses simply because the government doesn't want to, And the other proposals are worthy of a far-right party. Banning fireworks? Why? It simply makes no sense.”
“This proposal is against the individual freedom”
“Voting YES for stronger public safety, mandatory penalties for repeat offenders, and sustained economic growth.”