Market-Liberalization And Deregulation Act of 2012
Rationale
The Market-Liberalization and Deregulation Act of 2012 promotes growth by privatizing public broadcasting, lowering the tobacco and vaping age to 18, reducing retirement age to 50, and prioritizing renewable energy, encouraging a free market, personal choice, and sustainability for a prosperous life
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Renewable Energy Mandates |
Renewables priority
|
Renewables priority
|
|
| 2 | Public Broadcasting Funding |
Limited public broadcaster (news/education remit; funded by small household levy)
|
No public broadcaster (privatize existing assets; advertising-only market)
|
|
| 3 | Tobacco & Vaping Regulation |
Heavy restrictions (plain packaging; indoor ban; age 21; advertising banned)
|
Light regulation (age 18, designated smoking areas, health warnings)
|
|
| 4 | Retirement Age Policy |
Retirement at 55
|
Retirement at 50
|
1
Renewable Energy Mandates2
Public Broadcasting Funding3
Tobacco & Vaping Regulation4
Retirement Age PolicyProposer
Party
Homeland
The Homeland Party champions a robust economy driven by free markets, unwavering national security, and a powerful military. We prioritize strong borders to protect our sovereignty and uphold a united national identity rooted in tradition and patriotism.
Core pillars
Camila Guerrero
Activist · Age 33
Born into a political dynasty, Camila Guerrero cut her teeth in media strategy before mastering the art of fiery oratory, forging alliances from boardrooms to grassroots movements while plotting her rapid ascent to power.
Timeline
-
Draft12 August 2012
-
Vote Open12 August 2012
-
Vote Closed11 October 2012
-
Did Not Become Law11 October 2012
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senado
FailedFor: 0 / 266 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 266
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Homeland Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Neo-Nationalism | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Alliance Of Costavela | 0 | No | No reason given |
| Reform Costavela | 0 | No | No reason given |
| The People’s Coalition | 0 | No | No reason given |
| United Labour | 0 | No | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 54 | Not voted |
Congress of Deputies
FailedFor: 0 / 350 seats (0.0%)
Against: 35 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 315
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Homeland Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Neo-Nationalism | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Alliance Of Costavela | 35 | No | No reason given |
| Reform Costavela | 0 | No | No reason given |
| The People’s Coalition | 0 | No | No reason given |
| United Labour | 0 | No | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 80 | Not voted |