“We are only in favor of article 2, we oppose the rest, and we partially reject this proposal”
Free Market Deregulation Proposal of 2022
Rationale
These reforms reduce excessive regulation, fostering economic freedom and individual responsibility while lowering compliance costs for businesses and citizens.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Competition & Monopolies |
Active competition enforcement
|
No competition intervention
|
|
| 2 | Child Labour Law |
No employment of any kind until age 18
|
Light work permitted from age 14; full employment from 16
|
|
| 3 | Vehicle Emissions Standards |
Emissions limits with gradual phase-in for new vehicles
|
No vehicle emissions standards whatsoever
|
|
| 4 | Housing Supply & Planning |
Strong national housing targets
|
Market-led, deregulated planning
|
|
| 5 | Rent Control |
Rent increases capped to inflation
|
Light stabilisation, mostly market rents
|
1
Competition & Monopolies2
Child Labour Law3
Vehicle Emissions Standards4
Housing Supply & Planning5
Rent ControlProposer
Party
Liberal
The party of bold progress where freedom fuels prosperity and dreams outrun limits.
Core pillars
Catalina Pérez
Activist · Age 29
The daughter of industrialists, Catalina leveraged her family’s wealth and razor-sharp analytical mind to fast-track her influence, known for her ruthless efficiency and unapologetic pragmatism in pursuing political power.
Timeline
-
Draft23 February 2022
-
Vote Open23 February 2022
-
Vote Closed24 April 2022
-
Did Not Become Law24 April 2022
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senado
FailedFor: 0 / 266 seats (0.0%)
Against: 163 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 103
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Christian Conservative Alliance | 16 | No | this lesgislation promovete the anarchy-capistalism in this honorable contury |
| Liberal Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| National Democratic Movement | 65 | No | This goes against our opinions, we vote against it |
| National Union Of Costavela | 51 | No | Nooooooooooooooooooooo |
| Revolutionary Socialist Union | 31 | No | We are only in favor of article 2, we oppose the rest, and we partially reject this proposal |
| Empty seats | 54 | Not voted |
Congress of Deputies
FailedFor: 122 / 350 seats (34.9%)
Against: 228 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Christian Conservative Alliance | 25 | No | this lesgislation promovete the anarchy-capistalism in this honorable contury |
| Liberal Proposer | 122 | Yes | No reason given |
| National Democratic Movement | 55 | No | This goes against our opinions, we vote against it |
| National Union Of Costavela | 28 | No | Nooooooooooooooooooooo |
| Revolutionary Socialist Union | 120 | No | We are only in favor of article 2, we oppose the rest, and we partially reject this proposal |
| Empty seats | 80 | Not voted |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“this lesgislation promovete the anarchy-capistalism in this honorable contury”
“Nooooooooooooooooooooo”
“This goes against our opinions, we vote against it”