Foreign Ownership & Quota Reform Act of 2011

Proposed by Unity & Freedom · fronted by Ramón Guerrero

Opened

19 Apr 2011

Voting closes

18 Jun 2011

Chambers

2 legislatures

Articles

2 changes

Rationale

The current laws surrounding foreign ownership and residential property quotas limit the potential for economic growth and international investment, while also creating an imbalance in the housing market. By lifting the ban on residential property ownership by foreigners and reforming annual quotas

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous		Proposed
1	Foreign Land Ownership	Foreign ownership limited to commercial property only; residential banned		No restrictions on foreign land purchases
2	Immigration Quota Policy	Annual quotas with caps		No quotas, open immigration

1

Foreign Land Ownership

Previous law

Foreign ownership limited to commercial property only; residential banned

No restrictions on foreign land purchases

2

Immigration Quota Policy

Previous law

Annual quotas with caps

No quotas, open immigration

Proposer

Party

Unity & Freedom

Unity & Freedom is a forward-looking political party committed to fostering a society where collaboration and personal liberty coexist. We believe that every citizen deserves the freedom to pursue their dreams while contributing to the common good. Our mission is to bridge divides, promote inclusive

Core pillars

Ramón Guerrero

Activist · Age 61

999 social followers

A shrewd and well-connected former labor organizer, Ramón Guerrero is known for his relentless ambition and willingness to do whatever it takes to advance his cause, leveraging his vast network to outmaneuver opponents.

🚀 Ambitious 🗡️ Ruthless 🔗 Well Connected 🔨 Working Class Background

Timeline

Draft

19 April 2011
Vote Open

19 April 2011
Vote Closed

18 June 2011
Did Not Become Law

18 June 2011

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Senado

Failed

0Yes 60No 206Not voted 266 seats

For: 0 / 266 seats (0.0%)

Against: 60 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 206

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 0.0%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
New Democratic Front	0	Yes	No reason given
Reform Costavela	60	No	No reason given
Unity & Freedom Proposer	0	Yes	No reason given
Empty seats	54	Not voted

Congress of Deputies

Failed

0Yes 94No 256Not voted 350 seats

For: 0 / 350 seats (0.0%)

Against: 94 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 256

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 0.0%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
New Democratic Front	0	Yes	No reason given
Reform Costavela	94	No	No reason given
Unity & Freedom Proposer	0	Yes	No reason given
Empty seats	80	Not voted

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

No votes cast yet.