Removing restrictions attracts foreign investment, boosts economic growth, and simplifies land transactions for greater public benefit.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foreign Land Ownership |
Foreign purchases require government approval
|
No restrictions on foreign land purchases
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 192 / 266 seats (72.2%)
Against: 74 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alianza Conservadora Popular | 74 | No | if we don't controle the land pursaches the pursaches and the economy wil be a chaos, I suggest gradually removing the restrictions little by little. |
| People And Planet | 0 | No | Removing restrictions risks our land becoming foreign owned, leaving us with less space to build houses etc |
| Revolutionary Socialist Union Proposer | 192 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 54 | Not voted |
For: 43 / 350 seats (12.3%)
Against: 246 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 61
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alianza Conservadora Popular | 76 | No | if we don't controle the land pursaches the pursaches and the economy wil be a chaos, I suggest gradually removing the restrictions little by little. |
| People And Planet | 170 | No | Removing restrictions risks our land becoming foreign owned, leaving us with less space to build houses etc |
| Revolutionary Socialist Union Proposer | 43 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 80 | Not voted |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Removing restrictions risks our land becoming foreign owned, leaving us with less space to build houses etc”
“if we don't controle the land pursaches the pursaches and the economy wil be a chaos, I suggest gradually removing the restrictions little by little.”