Modernizing regulation to boost economic growth while maintaining safe, flexible labor standards for public benefit.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Banking & Financial Regulation |
Capital controls, separated retail/investment banking
|
Strong prudential oversight
|
|
| 2 | Competition & Monopolies |
Active competition enforcement
|
Permissive on mergers and scale
|
|
| 3 | Maximum Working Hours |
Mandatory four-day work week (28 hours maximum)
|
40-hour weekly maximum with overtime controls
|
Party
The Alliance champions free enterprise as the engine of progress where liberty fuels ambition and diplomacy paves the road to stability
Core pillars
Prime Minister · Age 30
A silver-tongued dealmaker with friends in high places, Ricardo Medina leverages his sharp pragmatism and unyielding principles to broker compromises, though his gift for persuasion sometimes draws suspicion about his true motives.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 81 / 266 seats (30.5%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 45 · Not voted: 140
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance Proposer | 28 | Yes | No reason given |
| People And Planet | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| People's Congress Of Costavela | 51 | Yes | We completely support this proposal. |
| Revolutionary Socialist Union | 45 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Solidarity Alliance | 2 | Yes | In agreement with this proposal. |
| Empty seats | 54 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 350 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 49 · Not voted: 301
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| People And Planet | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| People's Congress Of Costavela | 0 | Yes | We completely support this proposal. |
| Revolutionary Socialist Union | 49 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Solidarity Alliance | 0 | Yes | In agreement with this proposal. |
| Empty seats | 80 | Not voted |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“In agreement with this proposal.”
“We completely support this proposal.”