“. . . . .”
Economic Deregulation Acceleration Act of 2020
Rationale
To boost economic growth and global competitiveness by reducing regulatory barriers, maximizing natural resources, and accelerating innovation for public prosperity.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Banking & Financial Regulation |
Strong prudential oversight
|
Deregulated financial centre
|
|
| 2 | Fossil Fuel Extraction |
Managed wind-down
|
Maximise domestic extraction
|
|
| 3 | AI Development & Safety |
Balanced oversight
|
No restrictions; accelerate AI
|
|
| 4 | Public Ownership of Key Industries |
Private, with strong regulation
|
Full privatisation, market discipline
|
|
| 5 | Automation & the Workforce |
Permit automation with strong retraining/transition rights
|
Actively incentivise automation
|
1
Banking & Financial Regulation2
Fossil Fuel Extraction3
AI Development & Safety4
Public Ownership of Key Industries5
Automation & the WorkforceProposer
Party
Liberal Union
The Liberal Union forges freedom through education and enterprise daring to build a future where no dream is out of reach
Core pillars
Rafael Santos
Activist · Age 35
Rafael Santos spent his youth organizing in Costavela’s factories before trading picket lines for think tanks, blending grassroots grit with a flair for viral soundbites that make him both a policy wonk and an unpredictable force on the stump.
Timeline
-
Draft24 June 2020
-
Vote Open15 July 2020
-
Vote Closed13 September 2020
-
Became Law13 September 2020
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senado
PassedFor: 229 / 266 seats (86.1%)
Against: 37 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Union Proposer | 229 | Yes | No reason given |
| Revolutionary Socialist Union | 37 | No | . . . . . |
| The Social Democrats | 0 | No | This legislation goes against the interest of the working class. |
| Empty seats | 54 | Not voted |
Congress of Deputies
PassedFor: 259 / 350 seats (74.0%)
Against: 91 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Union Proposer | 259 | Yes | No reason given |
| Revolutionary Socialist Union | 91 | No | . . . . . |
| The Social Democrats | 0 | No | This legislation goes against the interest of the working class. |
| Empty seats | 80 | Not voted |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This legislation goes against the interest of the working class.”