“We were going to make similar legislation, so I vote yes”
Whistleblower Protections Act of 2024
Rationale
Current whistleblower protections are ineffective; stronger legal support and financial incentives will encourage disclosures that expose fraud, waste, and harm to the public.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whistleblower Protection |
Protection from dismissal and retaliation for reports to regulators
|
Strong legal protection, free legal support and a share of recoveries for successful disclosures
|
1
Whistleblower ProtectionProposer
Party
Moderates
Moderates is a centrist liberal party championing the middle class, modern infrastructure and responsible government. We believe in strong leadership, economic opportunity and diplomatic solutions that protect stability while delivering practical progress.
Core pillars
Laurent Mathieu
Activist · Age 52
A lifelong factory worker turned firebrand orator, Laurent Mathieu’s speeches still carry the cadence of the picket line, blending working-class grit with a media-savvy flair for turning outrage into policy demands.
Timeline
-
Draft3 December 2024
-
Vote Open3 December 2024
-
Vote Closes1 February 2025
-
Became LawNot completed yet
Vote tally
Currently passingLive tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
PassingFor: 246 / 348 seats (70.7%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 102
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 59 | Yes | We support this bill |
| Blue Labour | 56 | Yes | This is an important act for our legal system |
| Charlemont Renewal | 0 | Not voted | |
| Charlemont Rise Up ! | 61 | Yes | ..................... |
| Green-left Movement | 88 | Not voted | |
| Moderates Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| National Front | 70 | Yes | We were going to make similar legislation, so I vote yes |
| Theist Communist Alliance | 0 | Not voted | |
| Empty seats | 14 | Not voted |
National Assembly
PassingFor: 409 / 577 seats (70.9%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 168
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 67 | Yes | We support this bill |
| Blue Labour | 109 | Yes | This is an important act for our legal system |
| Charlemont Renewal | 0 | Not voted | |
| Charlemont Rise Up ! | 159 | Yes | ..................... |
| Common Ground | 46 | Not voted | |
| Green-left Movement | 105 | Not voted | |
| Moderates Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| National Front | 74 | Yes | We were going to make similar legislation, so I vote yes |
| Empty seats | 17 | Not voted |
Presidency
PassingFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rémi Garnier | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This is an important act for our legal system”
“We support this bill”
“.....................”