Solidarity must not break down. Solidarity is a cornerstone of our social system, and receiving benefits is not an obligation; therefore, it is the duty of every unemployed person to give something back to those in work by making a minimal contribution to society.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Welfare Conditionality |
Light conditions, few sanctions
|
Mandatory work-for-benefits
|
Party
A liberal-conservative right-wing political party that seeks to restore Charlemont's greatness and power.
Core pillars
Presidency · Age 26
Starting as a streetwise organiser in his teens, Rémi Garnier parlayed grit and connections into a rising force for change, blending relentless energy with an uncompromising stance against corruption.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 139 / 348 seats (39.9%)
Against: 120 · Abstained: 59 · Not voted: 30
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 59 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Blue Labour | 35 | No | This completely discounts I'll people and people who can't find work, a bit of the population that will grow with AI development. |
| Charlemont Rise Up ! Proposer | 68 | Yes | No reason given |
| Green-left Movement | 82 | No | The Green-Left Movement opposes mandatory work-for-benefits because social assistance is a safety net, not a punishment for unemployment or poverty. Genuine solidarity means helping people into secure, fairly paid work through training and support rather than forcing them to labour simply to receive basic assistance. |
| National Front | 71 | Yes | We support this legislation |
| Radical Republicans | 3 | No | .................. . |
| Empty seats | 14 | Not voted |
For: 244 / 577 seats (42.3%)
Against: 138 · Abstained: 67 · Not voted: 128
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 67 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Blue Labour | 41 | No | This completely discounts I'll people and people who can't find work, a bit of the population that will grow with AI development. |
| Charlemont Rise Up ! Proposer | 128 | Yes | No reason given |
| Green-left Movement | 97 | No | The Green-Left Movement opposes mandatory work-for-benefits because social assistance is a safety net, not a punishment for unemployment or poverty. Genuine solidarity means helping people into secure, fairly paid work through training and support rather than forcing them to labour simply to receive basic assistance. |
| National Front | 116 | Yes | We support this legislation |
| Radical Republicans | 0 | No | .................. . |
| Empty seats | 17 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charlemont Rise Up ! Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We support this legislation”
“.................. .”
“The Green-Left Movement opposes mandatory work-for-benefits because social assistance is a safety net, not a punishment for unemployment or poverty. Genuine solidarity means helping people into secure, fairly paid work through training and support rather than forcing them to labour simply to receive basic assistance.”
“This completely discounts I'll people and people who can't find work, a bit of the population that will grow with AI development.”