Modernize policing to improve public safety and trust by ensuring consistent armed presence for frontline officers, targeting serious crimes, and strengthening civilian oversight of misconduct.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Armed Police |
Police routinely carry military-grade weapons
|
All frontline officers routinely armed
|
|
| 2 | Police Powers |
Zero tolerance
|
Focus on highest impact crimes
|
|
| 3 | Police Accountability |
An independent body handles all misconduct allegations
|
Civilian oversight board that can dismiss officers and open prosecutions
|
Party
We plant justice where profits once grew and tend the roots of a society that leaves no one behind.
Core pillars
Candidate for Presidency · Age 30
Once a decorated officer who leveraged his military discipline into a career as a media personality, Alexandre Roussel commands attention both on stage and in policy discussions with his blend of analytical rigor and star power.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 117 / 348 seats (33.6%)
Against: 193 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 38
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 54 | No | We respectfully vote no |
| Blue Labour | 35 | Yes | We support these reforms |
| Charlemont Renewal | 0 | No | We agree with article 1 and 3 but not with 2 |
| Charlemont Rise Up ! | 68 | No | No . |
| Green-left Movement Proposer | 82 | Yes | No reason given |
| National Front | 71 | No | This is terrible piece of legislation, but support article 1 |
| Empty seats | 14 | Not voted |
For: 171 / 577 seats (29.6%)
Against: 269 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 137
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 51 | No | We respectfully vote no |
| Blue Labour | 57 | Yes | We support these reforms |
| Charlemont Renewal | 0 | No | We agree with article 1 and 3 but not with 2 |
| Charlemont Rise Up ! | 109 | No | No . |
| Green-left Movement Proposer | 114 | Yes | No reason given |
| National Front | 109 | No | This is terrible piece of legislation, but support article 1 |
| Empty seats | 17 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Green-left Movement Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We respectfully vote no”
“We agree with article 1 and 3 but not with 2”
“This is terrible piece of legislation, but support article 1”
“We support these reforms”
“No .”