“Yes to progess and security”
Maximizing Domestic Fossil Fuel Extraction Act of 2023
Rationale
To boost energy independence and lower costs by prioritising domestic fossil fuel extraction for national security and economic stability.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fossil Fuel Extraction |
Licensed extraction with limits
|
Maximise domestic extraction
|
1
Fossil Fuel ExtractionProposer
Party
National Front
We support National Pride, Strict Immigration Laws, Investment in Law Enforcement, Agriculture & Mining, Domestic Oil & Gas Extraction, and Limited Red & Green Tape for businesses.
Core pillars
Arthur David
Activist · Age 47
A once reluctant academic who rose to prominence as a controversial but brilliant policy wonk, his razor-sharp debates in the public square made him a leader before he knew he had followers—now his unwavering integrity and command of facts draw both crowds and reluctant allies.
Timeline
-
Draft1 May 2023
-
Vote Open1 May 2023
-
Vote Closed30 June 2023
-
Did Not Become Law30 June 2023
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
FailedFor: 160 / 348 seats (46.0%)
Against: 162 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 26
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 27 | Yes | Yes to progess and security |
| Blue Labour | 56 | No | Out planet will suffer |
| Charlemont Rise Up ! | 60 | Yes | We must produce in order to survive the economic crisis. |
| Green-left Movement | 65 | No | We can't suppot is legislation in good conscience. |
| National Front Proposer | 73 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Front | 41 | No | We oppose this legislation. |
| Empty seats | 14 | Not voted |
National Assembly
PassedFor: 258 / 577 seats (44.7%)
Against: 232 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 87
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 57 | Yes | Yes to progess and security |
| Blue Labour | 73 | No | Out planet will suffer |
| Charlemont Rise Up ! | 91 | Yes | We must produce in order to survive the economic crisis. |
| Green-left Movement | 87 | No | We can't suppot is legislation in good conscience. |
| National Front Proposer | 110 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Front | 72 | No | We oppose this legislation. |
| Empty seats | 17 | Not voted |
Presidency
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Green-left Movement | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We oppose this legislation.”
“Out planet will suffer”
“We must produce in order to survive the economic crisis.”
“We can't suppot is legislation in good conscience.”