Mandatory Union Membership Act of 2016
Rationale
Closed-shop union membership ensures consistent labour standards, reduces workplace disputes, and strengthens workers' collective power to negotiate fair wages and conditions nationwide.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trade Union Rights |
Full collective bargaining and strike rights
|
Mandatory union membership for all workers (closed shop)
|
1
Trade Union RightsProposer
Party
Red Front Of Charlemont
The Red Front of Charlemont is a revolutionary movement dedicated to dismantling class hierarchy and establishing a worker-led state. Rooted in Marxist principles, it seeks to nationalize key industries, redistribute wealth, and ensure that political power rests firmly in the hands of the proletaria
Core pillars
Monique André
Activist · Age 45
A reclusive but razor-sharp strategist with deep ties in elite circles, she operates in the shadows to ensure integrity never wavers—even when others do.
Timeline
-
Draft6 March 2016
-
Vote Open6 March 2016
-
Vote Closed5 May 2016
-
Did Not Become Law5 May 2016
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
FailedFor: 148 / 348 seats (42.5%)
Against: 189 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 11
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 31 | No | No reason given |
| Christian Distributists | 87 | No | No reason given |
| Horizon | 71 | No | No reason given |
| People's Labour Forum | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Red Front Of Charlemont Proposer | 71 | Yes | No reason given |
| Social Democrats | 67 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Progressive Lodge | 10 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 14 | Not voted |
National Assembly
PassedFor: 316 / 577 seats (54.8%)
Against: 261 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 45 | No | No reason given |
| Christian Distributists | 127 | No | No reason given |
| Horizon | 89 | No | No reason given |
| People's Labour Forum | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Red Front Of Charlemont Proposer | 179 | Yes | No reason given |
| Social Democrats | 107 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Progressive Lodge | 30 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 17 | Not voted |
Presidency
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Front Of Charlemont Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |