National Front
Voted Feb. 7, 2022
Abstain
Foreign Land Ownership Freedom Act of 2021
Failing
passing in 0 of 2 chambers
Opened
17 Dec 2021
Voting closes
15 Feb 2022
Chambers
2 legislatures
Articles
1 change
Rationale
Removing foreign land purchase restrictions boosts investment, economic growth, and job creation while ensuring fair market access for all.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foreign Land Ownership |
Foreign purchases require government approval
|
No restrictions on foreign land purchases
|
1
Foreign Land OwnershipPrevious law
Foreign purchases require government approval
No restrictions on foreign land purchases
Proposer
Party
ALAYON
ALAYON builds a future where order and opportunity rise together, forging a nation of strength and vision.
Core pillars
👮♂️
🏢
📚
🏗️
LG
Léo Girard
Chancellor of the exchequer · Age 47
480,064 social followers
Léo Girard, a fiery orator with a working-class upbringing, uses his street-smart instincts and idealistic vision to rally crowds and challenge the status quo with passionate, principled speeches.
🎤 Fantastic Speaker
🌟 Idealist
🏙️ Street Smart
🔨 Working Class Background
Timeline
-
Draft17 December 2021
-
Vote Open17 December 2021
-
Vote Closed15 February 2022
-
Did Not Become Law15 February 2022
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
Failed
26Yes
109No
70Abstained
143Not voted
348 seats
For: 26 / 348 seats (7.5%)
Against: 109 · Abstained: 70 · Not voted: 143
50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 19.3%)
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON Proposer | 26 | Yes | No reason given |
| Green-left Movement | 100 | No | The Green-Left Movement opposes this bill because unrestricted foreign land ownership could drive speculation, raise land and housing prices, and weaken local communities’ control over vital resources. Investment should be welcomed when it serves the public interest and protects affordable access to land. |
| National Front | 70 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Progressive Front | 9 | No | We are against this legislation. |
| The Liberal Socialista | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 14 | Not voted |
National Assembly
Failed
12Yes
158No
74Abstained
333Not voted
577 seats
For: 12 / 577 seats (2.1%)
Against: 158 · Abstained: 74 · Not voted: 333
50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 7.1%)
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON Proposer | 12 | Yes | No reason given |
| Green-left Movement | 112 | No | The Green-Left Movement opposes this bill because unrestricted foreign land ownership could drive speculation, raise land and housing prices, and weaken local communities’ control over vital resources. Investment should be welcomed when it serves the public interest and protects affordable access to land. |
| National Front | 74 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Progressive Front | 46 | No | We are against this legislation. |
| The Liberal Socialista | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 17 | Not voted |
Presidency
Passed
0Yes
0No
1Not voted
1 seat
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
Green-left Movement
Voted Jan. 21, 2022
No
“The Green-Left Movement opposes this bill because unrestricted foreign land ownership could drive speculation, raise land and housing prices, and weaken local communities’ control over vital resources. Investment should be welcomed when it serves the public interest and protects affordable access to land.”
Progressive Front
Voted Jan. 20, 2022
No
“We are against this legislation.”
The Liberal Socialista
Voted Jan. 8, 2022
Abstain