These changes boost energy independence and reduce costs by prioritizing domestic production and eliminating burdensome regulations.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fossil Fuel Extraction |
Licensed extraction with limits
|
Maximise domestic extraction
|
|
| 2 | Renewable Energy Mandates |
Balanced energy mix
|
No energy regulation (any fuel source permitted; no environmental standards)
|
Party
We support National Pride, Strict Immigration Laws, Investment in Law Enforcement, Agriculture & Mining, Domestic Oil & Gas Extraction, and Limited Red & Green Tape for businesses.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 47
A once reluctant academic who rose to prominence as a controversial but brilliant policy wonk, his razor-sharp debates in the public square made him a leader before he knew he had followers—now his unwavering integrity and command of facts draw both crowds and reluctant allies.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 160 / 348 seats (46.0%)
Against: 162 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 26
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 27 | Yes | Yes to the proposed bill |
| Blue Labour | 56 | No | We must take action to reduce climate change |
| Charlemont Rise Up ! | 60 | Yes | More money and energy! |
| Green-left Movement | 65 | No | The Green-Left Movement opposes this bill because maximising energy extraction and dismantling environmental safeguards prioritises short-term production over public health and the climate. True energy independence requires investment in clean, renewable energy that delivers sustainable and affordable power for future generations. |
| National Front Proposer | 73 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Front | 41 | No | We do not support this legislation. |
| Empty seats | 14 | Not voted |
For: 333 / 577 seats (57.7%)
Against: 241 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 3
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 65 | Yes | Yes to the proposed bill |
| Blue Labour | 91 | No | We must take action to reduce climate change |
| Charlemont Rise Up ! | 103 | Yes | More money and energy! |
| Green-left Movement | 93 | No | The Green-Left Movement opposes this bill because maximising energy extraction and dismantling environmental safeguards prioritises short-term production over public health and the climate. True energy independence requires investment in clean, renewable energy that delivers sustainable and affordable power for future generations. |
| National Front Proposer | 165 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Front | 57 | No | We do not support this legislation. |
| Empty seats | 17 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Green-left Movement | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We do not support this legislation.”
“The Green-Left Movement opposes this bill because maximising energy extraction and dismantling environmental safeguards prioritises short-term production over public health and the climate. True energy independence requires investment in clean, renewable energy that delivers sustainable and affordable power for future generations.”
“More money and energy!”
“Yes to the proposed bill”
“We must take action to reduce climate change”