Maximising domestic extraction boosts energy security and reduces reliance on volatile global markets, lowering costs for households and businesses.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fossil Fuel Extraction |
Licensed extraction with limits
|
Maximise domestic extraction
|
Party
We support National Pride, Strict Immigration Laws, Investment in Law Enforcement, Agriculture & Mining, Domestic Oil & Gas Extraction, and Limited Red & Green Tape for businesses.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 47
A once reluctant academic who rose to prominence as a controversial but brilliant policy wonk, his razor-sharp debates in the public square made him a leader before he knew he had followers—now his unwavering integrity and command of facts draw both crowds and reluctant allies.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 160 / 348 seats (46.0%)
Against: 121 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 67
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 27 | Yes | Yes……….:..::::::…….. |
| Blue Labour | 56 | No | Blue labour believes in environmental protection. If we don't take action now, humanity will suffer |
| Charlemont Rise Up ! | 60 | Yes | Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees |
| Green-left Movement | 65 | No | Once again, the Green-Left Movement opposes this Act because expanding fossil fuel extraction locks Charlemont into greater pollution and carbon emissions while delaying the transition to clean energy. Lasting energy security should come from affordable domestic renewables, efficiency, and a resilient green energy system. |
| National Front Proposer | 73 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Front | 0 | No | We oppose this legislation. |
| Empty seats | 14 | Not voted |
For: 330 / 577 seats (57.2%)
Against: 138 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 109
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 86 | Yes | Yes……….:..::::::…….. |
| Blue Labour | 41 | No | Blue labour believes in environmental protection. If we don't take action now, humanity will suffer |
| Charlemont Rise Up ! | 128 | Yes | Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees |
| Green-left Movement | 97 | No | Once again, the Green-Left Movement opposes this Act because expanding fossil fuel extraction locks Charlemont into greater pollution and carbon emissions while delaying the transition to clean energy. Lasting energy security should come from affordable domestic renewables, efficiency, and a resilient green energy system. |
| National Front Proposer | 116 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Front | 0 | No | We oppose this legislation. |
| Empty seats | 17 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Green-left Movement | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Blue labour believes in environmental protection. If we don't take action now, humanity will suffer”
“We don't support the proposal”
“Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees”
“We oppose this legislation.”
“Yes……….:..::::::……..”
“Once again, the Green-Left Movement opposes this Act because expanding fossil fuel extraction locks Charlemont into greater pollution and carbon emissions while delaying the transition to clean energy. Lasting energy security should come from affordable domestic renewables, efficiency, and a resilient green energy system.”