“We support proposed changes.”
Clean Air And Climate Act of 2024
Rationale
The Clean Air and Climate Act will put public health and our planet before polluters’ profits. Carbon pricing, limits on fossil extraction, strict pollution controls and vehicle emission standards will deliver cleaner air, safer water and a sustainable future.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carbon Pricing |
No carbon price
|
Economy-wide carbon price at a moderate rate
|
|
| 2 | Fossil Fuel Extraction |
Maximise domestic extraction
|
Licensed extraction with limits
|
|
| 3 | Industrial Pollution & Water |
Industry sets its own standards
|
Strict air and water limits, actively inspected
|
|
| 4 | Vehicle Emissions Standards |
No vehicle emissions standards whatsoever
|
Strict emissions standards with immediate enforcement and heavy fines
|
1
Carbon Pricing2
Fossil Fuel Extraction3
Industrial Pollution & Water4
Vehicle Emissions StandardsProposer
Party
Green-left Movement
We plant justice where profits once grew and tend the roots of a society that leaves no one behind.
Core pillars
Alexandre Roussel
Candidate for Presidency · Age 30
Once a decorated officer who leveraged his military discipline into a career as a media personality, Alexandre Roussel commands attention both on stage and in policy discussions with his blend of analytical rigor and star power.
Timeline
-
Draft22 June 2024
-
Vote Open22 June 2024
-
Vote Closed21 August 2024
-
Did Not Become Law21 August 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
FailedFor: 144 / 348 seats (41.4%)
Against: 190 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 14
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 59 | No | We respectfully vote no |
| Blue Labour | 56 | Yes | This is a great bill |
| Charlemont Rise Up ! | 61 | No | I agree with some of the measures, but there are too many bad ones. |
| Common Ground | 0 | Yes | We support proposed changes. |
| Green-left Movement Proposer | 88 | Yes | No reason given |
| National Front | 70 | No | This proposal would crash our Oil & Gas sector, and by extension, our economy as a whole |
| Empty seats | 14 | Not voted |
National Assembly
FailedFor: 248 / 577 seats (43.0%)
Against: 282 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 47
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 43 | No | We respectfully vote no |
| Blue Labour | 89 | Yes | This is a great bill |
| Charlemont Rise Up ! | 150 | No | I agree with some of the measures, but there are too many bad ones. |
| Common Ground | 0 | Yes | We support proposed changes. |
| Green-left Movement Proposer | 159 | Yes | No reason given |
| National Front | 89 | No | This proposal would crash our Oil & Gas sector, and by extension, our economy as a whole |
| Empty seats | 17 | Not voted |
Presidency
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rémi Garnier | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This proposal would crash our Oil & Gas sector, and by extension, our economy as a whole”
“We respectfully vote no”
“I agree with some of the measures, but there are too many bad ones.”
“This is a great bill”