“The Green-Left Movement strongly supports this bill because we proposed it to put voters—not corporations, unions, or wealthy interests—at the heart of our democracy. Public-only election funding would create a fairer, more transparent political system where every voice has an equal chance to be heard.”
Ban Corporate Political Donations Act of 2021
Rationale
Corporate/union donations distort democracy; public-only funding ensures fair, transparent elections focused on voters, not wealthy interests.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lobbying & Political Donations |
Disclosure rules, few limits
|
Ban corporate/union donations, public-only funding
|
1
Lobbying & Political DonationsProposer
Party
The Liberal Socialista
Peace Prosperity and Freedom
Core pillars
Laurent Michel
Activist · Age 58
Raised in a cramped council flat, Laurent Michel’s charisma masks his deep-seated insecurities, fueling a hunger for power while his halting public speaking forces him to rely on charm over eloquence.
Timeline
-
Draft14 December 2021
-
Vote Open14 December 2021
-
Vote Closed12 February 2022
-
Did Not Become Law12 February 2022
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
FailedFor: 126 / 348 seats (36.2%)
Against: 194 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 28
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Green-left Movement | 100 | Yes | The Green-Left Movement strongly supports this bill because we proposed it to put voters—not corporations, unions, or wealthy interests—at the heart of our democracy. Public-only election funding would create a fairer, more transparent political system where every voice has an equal chance to be heard. |
| National Front | 194 | No | This is a ridiculous policy, we say NO |
| Progressive Front | 9 | Yes | We support this legislation. |
| The Liberal Socialista Proposer | 17 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 14 | Not voted |
National Assembly
FailedFor: 201 / 577 seats (34.8%)
Against: 358 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 18
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Green-left Movement | 112 | Yes | The Green-Left Movement strongly supports this bill because we proposed it to put voters—not corporations, unions, or wealthy interests—at the heart of our democracy. Public-only election funding would create a fairer, more transparent political system where every voice has an equal chance to be heard. |
| National Front | 358 | No | This is a ridiculous policy, we say NO |
| Progressive Front | 46 | Yes | We support this legislation. |
| The Liberal Socialista Proposer | 43 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 17 | Not voted |
Presidency
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Green-left Movement | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This is a ridiculous policy, we say NO”
“We support this legislation.”