Updates clarify that lethal force requires human accountability, reducing risks of unintended harm and ensuring ethical oversight in warfare.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Autonomous Weapons Systems |
Autonomous systems for defence only
|
Permitted with mandatory human control
|
Party
We support National Pride, Strict Immigration Laws, Investment in Law Enforcement, Agriculture & Mining, Domestic Oil & Gas Extraction, and Limited Red & Green Tape for businesses.
Core pillars
Minister of Ecological Transition and Energy · Age 45
A former military strategist and corporate turnaround specialist, Thomas Leroy parlayed his knack for practical solutions and magnetic charm into a meteoric rise through elite political circles.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 212 / 348 seats (60.9%)
Against: 125 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 11
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 20 | Yes | We vote Yes to this bill |
| Blue Labour | 46 | Yes | we support the propasol |
| Charlemont Rise Up ! | 0 | Yes | We must create the most powerful army on the continent. |
| Green-left Movement | 71 | No | The Green-Left Movement opposes authorizing autonomous lethal weapons because no machine should be entrusted with decisions over life and death. Even with human oversight, these systems risk unintended civilian harm and weaken clear human accountability for the use of lethal force. |
| National Front Proposer | 146 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Front | 54 | No | We oppose this legislation. |
| Empty seats | 14 | Not voted |
For: 325 / 577 seats (56.3%)
Against: 228 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 24
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 8 | Yes | We vote Yes to this bill |
| Blue Labour | 31 | Yes | we support the propasol |
| Charlemont Rise Up ! | 0 | Yes | We must create the most powerful army on the continent. |
| Green-left Movement | 168 | No | The Green-Left Movement opposes authorizing autonomous lethal weapons because no machine should be entrusted with decisions over life and death. Even with human oversight, these systems risk unintended civilian harm and weaken clear human accountability for the use of lethal force. |
| National Front Proposer | 286 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Front | 60 | No | We oppose this legislation. |
| Empty seats | 17 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Front Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We oppose this legislation.”
“We must create the most powerful army on the continent.”
“The Green-Left Movement opposes authorizing autonomous lethal weapons because no machine should be entrusted with decisions over life and death. Even with human oversight, these systems risk unintended civilian harm and weaken clear human accountability for the use of lethal force.”
“we support the propasol”
“We vote Yes to this bill”