“This is a horrific proposal”
Agricultural And Water Deregulation Act of 2024
Rationale
These reforms boost efficiency and resilience by aligning agriculture with market demands and ensuring water access for growth, benefiting consumers and producers alike.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Agricultural Market Regime |
Import quotas and price floors protect domestic farmers
|
Open agricultural trade; intervention only in emergencies
|
|
| 2 | Water Usage & Allocation |
Compulsory metering and conservation targets
|
No restrictions on abstraction or use
|
1
Agricultural Market Regime2
Water Usage & AllocationProposer
Party
National Front
We support National Pride, Strict Immigration Laws, Investment in Law Enforcement, Agriculture & Mining, Domestic Oil & Gas Extraction, and Limited Red & Green Tape for businesses.
Core pillars
Arthur David
Activist · Age 47
A once reluctant academic who rose to prominence as a controversial but brilliant policy wonk, his razor-sharp debates in the public square made him a leader before he knew he had followers—now his unwavering integrity and command of facts draw both crowds and reluctant allies.
Timeline
-
Draft28 October 2024
-
Vote Open28 October 2024
-
Vote Closes27 December 2024
-
Became LawNot completed yet
Vote tally
Currently passingLive tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
PassingFor: 131 / 348 seats (37.6%)
Against: 115 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 102
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 59 | No | We respectfully vote NO to the First Provision since we are the Author of the current law. |
| Blue Labour | 56 | No | This is a horrific proposal |
| Charlemont Renewal | 0 | Not voted | |
| Charlemont Rise Up ! | 61 | Yes | Money. . |
| Green-left Movement | 88 | Not voted | |
| National Front Proposer | 70 | Yes | No reason given |
| Theist Communist Alliance | 0 | Not voted | |
| Empty seats | 14 | Not voted |
National Assembly
PassingFor: 233 / 577 seats (40.4%)
Against: 176 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 168
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 67 | No | We respectfully vote NO to the First Provision since we are the Author of the current law. |
| Blue Labour | 109 | No | This is a horrific proposal |
| Charlemont Renewal | 0 | Not voted | |
| Charlemont Rise Up ! | 159 | Yes | Money. . |
| Common Ground | 46 | Not voted | |
| Green-left Movement | 105 | Not voted | |
| National Front Proposer | 74 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 17 | Not voted |
Presidency
PassingFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rémi Garnier | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Money. .”
“We respectfully vote NO to the First Provision since we are the Author of the current law.”