Proposed by National Front in Charlemont
Opening this package cost 60 PP.
Current wording is shown as it was when voting began.
This Amendment would allow for a more Democratic Constitution and allow for a series of constitutional reforms that I wish to propose to parliament.
For: 310 / 348 seats (89.1%) — needs 66.6%
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 38
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 54 | Yes | We are in favor of the constitutional amendments |
| Blue Labour | 35 | Yes | Because of the supermajority safeguard, we support this |
| Charlemont Renewal | 0 | Abstain | We don't care about it |
| Charlemont Rise Up ! | 68 | Yes | Support . |
| Green-left Movement | 82 | Yes | .............................. |
| National Front Proposer | 71 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 440 / 577 seats (76.3%) — needs 66.6%
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 137
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 51 | Yes | We are in favor of the constitutional amendments |
| Blue Labour | 57 | Yes | Because of the supermajority safeguard, we support this |
| Charlemont Renewal | 0 | Abstain | We don't care about it |
| Charlemont Rise Up ! | 109 | Yes | Support . |
| Green-left Movement | 114 | Yes | .............................. |
| National Front Proposer | 109 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“..............................”
“Because of the supermajority safeguard, we support this”
“We are in favor of the constitutional amendments”
“We don't care about it”
“The Green-Left Movement opposes removing the two-year constitutional cooldown because fundamental rules should not be repeatedly rewritten for short-term political interests. The safeguard encourages stability, careful deliberation and broad consensus before further constitutional changes are proposed.”
“Support .”