Proposed by The Liberal Socialista in Charlemont
Opening this package cost 60 PP.
Current wording is shown as it was when voting began.
These modifications to the Constitution ensure that there is no room for abuse of power and that the People are implicated in the states decision making process
For: 117 / 348 seats (33.6%) — needs 66.6%
Against: 220 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 11
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 26 | No | Redistribution of the Police powers should not be implemented as it undermine the role of the President. For Treaties, the Senate should remain as the sole approving authority. |
| Green-left Movement | 100 | Yes | The Green-Left Movement supports these constitutional changes because they strengthen democratic oversight, reduce the risk of concentrated executive power, and place important state decisions in accountable institutions. Independent, non-partisan professionals should also play a key role in sensitive decisions such as designating extremist organisations, protecting the process from political abuse. |
| National Front | 194 | No | These topics should be debated further, but we can not agree to this power change yet |
| The Liberal Socialista Proposer | 17 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 229 / 577 seats (39.7%) — needs 66.6%
Against: 285 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 63
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAYON | 54 | No | Redistribution of the Police powers should not be implemented as it undermine the role of the President. For Treaties, the Senate should remain as the sole approving authority. |
| Green-left Movement | 213 | Yes | The Green-Left Movement supports these constitutional changes because they strengthen democratic oversight, reduce the risk of concentrated executive power, and place important state decisions in accountable institutions. Independent, non-partisan professionals should also play a key role in sensitive decisions such as designating extremist organisations, protecting the process from political abuse. |
| National Front | 231 | No | These topics should be debated further, but we can not agree to this power change yet |
| The Liberal Socialista Proposer | 16 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“These topics should be debated further, but we can not agree to this power change yet”
“Redistribution of the Police powers should not be implemented as it undermine the role of the President. For Treaties, the Senate should remain as the sole approving authority.”
“The Green-Left Movement supports these constitutional changes because they strengthen democratic oversight, reduce the risk of concentrated executive power, and place important state decisions in accountable institutions. Independent, non-partisan professionals should also play a key role in sensitive decisions such as designating extremist organisations, protecting the process from political abuse.”