“Perfect proposal which stands for the agenda that what we fight for.”
Welfare Benefits Act of 2021
Rationale
Transitioning to unconditional benefits simplifies access, reduces poverty stigma, and ensures no one falls through cracks due to bureaucratic hurdles.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Welfare Conditionality |
Light conditions, few sanctions
|
Unconditional benefits
|
1
Welfare ConditionalityProposer
Party
Progressive Reform
The Progressive Reform Party plants seeds of justice for workers young and old nurturing tomorrow’s roots today
Core pillars
Genevieve Sinclair
Activist · Age 52
Genevieve Sinclair rose from a provincial radio host to become a powerbroker, blending polished rhetoric with behind-the-scenes dealmaking to shape policy and power behind closed doors.
Timeline
-
Draft13 April 2021
-
Vote Open13 April 2021
-
Vote Closed12 June 2021
-
Did Not Become Law12 June 2021
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
House of Representatives
PassedFor: 253 / 435 seats (58.2%)
Against: 127 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 55
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free People Liberals | 24 | No | Not good. You people decreasing working age 16 and this is for just feed unconditional benefits? So youth people work and other ones lives free? |
| Homeland Union | 103 | No | There should be some light conditions to receive welfare |
| Pax Americana | 105 | Yes | i think i can get behind this |
| Progressive Reform Proposer | 84 | Yes | No reason given |
| Socialist Broadlands Union Technocrats | 29 | Yes | I have no idea if I agree or disagree with your policies, all over the place. |
| Together - Worker's Alliance | 35 | Yes | Perfect proposal which stands for the agenda that what we fight for. |
Senate
PassedFor: 58 / 100 seats (58.0%)
Against: 30 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 12
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free People Liberals | 6 | No | Not good. You people decreasing working age 16 and this is for just feed unconditional benefits? So youth people work and other ones lives free? |
| Homeland Union | 24 | No | There should be some light conditions to receive welfare |
| Pax Americana | 24 | Yes | i think i can get behind this |
| Progressive Reform Proposer | 19 | Yes | No reason given |
| Socialist Broadlands Union Technocrats | 7 | Yes | I have no idea if I agree or disagree with your policies, all over the place. |
| Together - Worker's Alliance | 8 | Yes | Perfect proposal which stands for the agenda that what we fight for. |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
Presidency
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Homeland Union | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“i think i can get behind this”
“There should be some light conditions to receive welfare”
“Not good. You people decreasing working age 16 and this is for just feed unconditional benefits? So youth people work and other ones lives free?”
“I have no idea if I agree or disagree with your policies, all over the place.”