To cut waste, boost recycling, and protect land and air for healthier communities.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Waste Management |
Licensed landfill and incineration with basic recycling targets
|
Deposit-return schemes, compulsory household separation and landfill caps
|
Party
The Progressive Reform Party plants seeds of justice for workers young and old nurturing tomorrow’s roots today
Core pillars
Candidate for Presidency · Age 50
Martin Chapman traded his military uniform for a political stage, using his disciplined mind and media savvy to bridge the gap between grassroots idealism and institutional power.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 224 / 435 seats (51.5%)
Against: 189 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 22
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands People's Alliance | 0 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| Green Social Union | 40 | Yes | This will help save the environment! |
| Homeland Union | 103 | No | Would be not good for our liberal market |
| Pax Americana | 86 | No | Saxenheim has the same policy - its hurting the retail sector |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 95 | Yes | Yes, that's not a bad idea! |
| Progressive Reform Proposer | 89 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 42 / 100 seats (42.0%)
Against: 52 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 6
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands People's Alliance | 0 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| Green Social Union | 14 | Yes | This will help save the environment! |
| Homeland Union | 23 | No | Would be not good for our liberal market |
| Pax Americana | 29 | No | Saxenheim has the same policy - its hurting the retail sector |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 13 | Yes | Yes, that's not a bad idea! |
| Progressive Reform Proposer | 15 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bernard Blake | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We support this proposal”
“Saxenheim has the same policy - its hurting the retail sector”
“This will help save the environment!”
“Would be not good for our liberal market”
“Yes, that's not a bad idea!”