To reduce youth access, public health risks, and societal costs by tightening regulations on alcohol and tobacco, protecting vulnerable populations while promoting long-term well-being.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alcohol Regulation |
Liberal policy (age 18; moderate tax; late opening permitted; public zones allowed)
|
Strict regulation (age 21; high excise; retail 10:00–20:00; public drinking banned)
|
|
| 2 | Tobacco & Vaping Regulation |
Light regulation (age 18, designated smoking areas, health warnings)
|
Heavy restrictions (plain packaging; indoor ban; age 21; advertising banned)
|
Party
A progressive, secular social-democratic party championing education, strong public services, workers’ rights, individual freedom, and a secure, prosperous Broadlands.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 37
A sharp-witted working-class strategist who rose from factory floors to become a master of coalition-building, using her keen analytical mind and unmatched connections to turn ideas into policy.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 237 / 435 seats (54.5%)
Against: 177 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 21
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands Social Democrats Proposer | 35 | Yes | No reason given |
| Green Social Union | 25 | Yes | While the GSU does not support raising ages to 21, we do support stricter regulation of both industries. |
| Homeland Union | 83 | Yes | A nice policy for the security and health of our children |
| Pax Americana | 120 | No | what's the point of this? |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 94 | Yes | We support this bill |
| Progressive Reform | 57 | No | This is not a good idea |
For: 36 / 100 seats (36.0%)
Against: 45 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 19
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands Social Democrats Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Green Social Union | 0 | Yes | While the GSU does not support raising ages to 21, we do support stricter regulation of both industries. |
| Homeland Union | 20 | Yes | A nice policy for the security and health of our children |
| Pax Americana | 24 | No | what's the point of this? |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 16 | Yes | We support this bill |
| Progressive Reform | 21 | No | This is not a good idea |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Chapman | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This is not a good idea”
“A nice policy for the security and health of our children”
“We support this bill”
“While the GSU does not support raising ages to 21, we do support stricter regulation of both industries.”
“what's the point of this?”