“right to firearms amendment coming soon”
Strict Firearms Licensing Act of 2024
Rationale
Strict licensing and limited categories reduce gun violence while maintaining responsible ownership, prioritizing public safety over unrestricted rights.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firearms Control |
Constitutional right to carry
|
Strict licensing, limited categories
|
1
Firearms ControlProposer
Party
Broadlands Social Democrats
A progressive, secular social-democratic party championing education, strong public services, workers’ rights, individual freedom, and a secure, prosperous Broadlands.
Core pillars
Adelaide Gallagher
Activist · Age 37
A sharp-witted working-class strategist who rose from factory floors to become a master of coalition-building, using her keen analytical mind and unmatched connections to turn ideas into policy.
Timeline
-
Draft15 February 2024
-
Vote Open15 February 2024
-
Vote Closed15 April 2024
-
Did Not Become Law15 April 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
House of Representatives
FailedFor: 0 / 435 seats (0.0%)
Against: 349 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 86
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands Social Democrats Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Green Social Union | 0 | Yes | While the GSU believes that this level of restriction is unnecessary, it is still vital that guns only be given to license individuals with background checks. |
| Homeland Union | 85 | No | Carrying weapons and its constitutional right is fundamental for our nation. |
| Pax Americana | 105 | No | right to firearms amendment coming soon |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 68 | No | We can't accept this bill! |
| Progressive Reform | 91 | No | This is not a good idea |
Senate
FailedFor: 0 / 100 seats (0.0%)
Against: 81 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 19
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands Social Democrats Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Green Social Union | 0 | Yes | While the GSU believes that this level of restriction is unnecessary, it is still vital that guns only be given to license individuals with background checks. |
| Homeland Union | 20 | No | Carrying weapons and its constitutional right is fundamental for our nation. |
| Pax Americana | 24 | No | right to firearms amendment coming soon |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 16 | No | We can't accept this bill! |
| Progressive Reform | 21 | No | This is not a good idea |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
Presidency
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Progressive Reform | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This is not a good idea”
“We can't accept this bill!”
“Carrying weapons and its constitutional right is fundamental for our nation.”
“While the GSU believes that this level of restriction is unnecessary, it is still vital that guns only be given to license individuals with background checks.”