Removing school selection promotes fairness and equal opportunity by ending unfair advantages for some students.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | School Selection |
Some selective schools
|
Comprehensive, no selection
|
Party
The party of the working hand that lifts the nation’s weight while the wealthy finally pay their share.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 38
Once a rising star in corporate law, Vivienne Harris abandoned prestige for power, leveraging her razor-sharp instincts and ruthless efficiency to build an unmatched web of influence, earning a reputation as the party’s most effective (and feared) operator.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 43 / 435 seats (9.9%)
Against: 183 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 209
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free People Liberals | 36 | No | We are not strongly disagree but, talented kids have to have different schools. |
| Homeland Union | 0 | No | There should be some selection for smarter children |
| Pax Americana | 98 | No | I think this is reducing our education infra, but i have no strong feelings on this |
| Progressive Reform | 49 | No | There should be some schools for more talented kids |
| Together - Worker's Alliance Proposer | 43 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 8 / 100 seats (8.0%)
Against: 49 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 43
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free People Liberals | 6 | No | We are not strongly disagree but, talented kids have to have different schools. |
| Homeland Union | 0 | No | There should be some selection for smarter children |
| Pax Americana | 24 | No | I think this is reducing our education infra, but i have no strong feelings on this |
| Progressive Reform | 19 | No | There should be some schools for more talented kids |
| Together - Worker's Alliance Proposer | 8 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pax Americana | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We are not strongly disagree but, talented kids have to have different schools.”
“There should be some selection for smarter children”
“There should be some schools for more talented kids”
“We don't have a very strong opinion on this topic”
“I think this is reducing our education infra, but i have no strong feelings on this”