These changes address escalating housing crises, pollution harming communities, and climate risks by ensuring accessible homes, holding polluters accountable, and cutting emissions economy-wide.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Social Housing |
Small stock for the most vulnerable; right-to-buy for tenants
|
Large municipal housing programme; right-to-buy abolished
|
|
| 2 | Carbon Pricing |
Low carbon price on heavy industry only
|
Economy-wide carbon price at a moderate rate
|
|
| 3 | Industrial Pollution & Water |
Strict air and water limits, actively inspected
|
Heavy penalties and criminal liability for executives
|
Party
The Progressive Reform Party plants seeds of justice for workers young and old nurturing tomorrow’s roots today
Core pillars
Candidate for Presidency · Age 50
Martin Chapman traded his military uniform for a political stage, using his disciplined mind and media savvy to bridge the gap between grassroots idealism and institutional power.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 187 / 435 seats (43.0%)
Against: 145 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 103
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Homeland Union | 60 | No | this proposal goes against the free market |
| Pax Americana | 85 | No | the question of piercing corporate veil should be settled by the courts |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 72 | Yes | We support this great bill |
| Progressive Reform Proposer | 115 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 47 / 100 seats (47.0%)
Against: 39 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 14
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Homeland Union | 0 | No | this proposal goes against the free market |
| Pax Americana | 39 | No | the question of piercing corporate veil should be settled by the courts |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 0 | Yes | We support this great bill |
| Progressive Reform Proposer | 47 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Progressive Reform Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“this proposal goes against the free market”
“We support this great bill”
“the question of piercing corporate veil should be settled by the courts”