Strict regulations protect youth, reduce addiction harm, and improve public health through targeted restrictions on addictive industries.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alcohol Regulation |
Liberal policy (age 18; moderate tax; late opening permitted; public zones allowed)
|
Strict regulation (age 21; high excise; retail 10:00–20:00; public drinking banned)
|
|
| 2 | Tobacco & Vaping Regulation |
Light regulation (age 18, designated smoking areas, health warnings)
|
Heavy restrictions (plain packaging; indoor ban; age 21; advertising banned)
|
|
| 3 | Public Health & Nutrition |
Labelling and ad limits for children
|
Bans on junk-food ads, mandatory reformulation
|
|
| 4 | Sex Work |
Legal, licensed and regulated
|
Selling legal, buying criminalised
|
|
| 5 | Gambling Regulation |
State-licensed casinos and lottery only
|
Liberal gambling (online platforms, private casinos, sports betting all permitted)
|
Party
The Socialist Broadlands Union Technocrats forge progress from tradition blending worker power with unshackled industry to build a nation that thrives without apology or limit.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 59
Andrew Moore built his reputation as a silver-tongued demagogue, wielding his charisma and brutally effective tactics to propel himself from protest podiums to the inner circles of power, leaving few who could resist his influence.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 113 / 435 seats (26.0%)
Against: 232 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 90
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free People Liberals | 24 | No | It has to be not accepted |
| Homeland Union | 103 | No | Against the free market and personal freedom |
| Pax Americana | 105 | No | whether its curfews or alcohol restriction, the impulse is recognizable - distrust of human agency |
| Progressive Reform | 84 | Yes | This is a good bill for the country |
| Socialist Broadlands Union Technocrats Proposer | 29 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 26 / 100 seats (26.0%)
Against: 54 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 20
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free People Liberals | 6 | No | It has to be not accepted |
| Homeland Union | 24 | No | Against the free market and personal freedom |
| Pax Americana | 24 | No | whether its curfews or alcohol restriction, the impulse is recognizable - distrust of human agency |
| Progressive Reform | 19 | Yes | This is a good bill for the country |
| Socialist Broadlands Union Technocrats Proposer | 7 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Homeland Union | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“whether its curfews or alcohol restriction, the impulse is recognizable - distrust of human agency”
“This is a good bill for the country”
“It has to be not accepted”
“Against the free market and personal freedom”