The oil industry was growing at 6%, let it go back to that high growth phase
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fossil Fuel Extraction |
Managed wind-down
|
Maximise domestic extraction
|
Party
We advocate for free trade, growth and democracy under Broadland's hegemony.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 26
At 21, Andrew Douglas emerged as a vocal advocate for sweeping reforms after his viral social media exposes on local corruption, earning both adoration from activists and suspicion from entrenched elites.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 258 / 435 seats (59.3%)
Against: 91 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 86
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands Social Democrats | 0 | No | It will harm environment. We need focus on renewables |
| Green Social Union | 0 | No | Fossil fuels harm the environment, and if we keep extracting them at increased rates we will be contributing to global warming. Another side-effect would be the faster rate that these resources are depleted, while this bill might provide short-term economic growth, it could lead to economic issues in the future. |
| Homeland Union | 85 | Yes | This is a very good proposal for our economy |
| Pax Americana Proposer | 105 | Yes | No reason given |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 68 | Yes | We support this bill |
| Progressive Reform | 91 | No | This is not a good idea |
For: 60 / 100 seats (60.0%)
Against: 21 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 19
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands Social Democrats | 0 | No | It will harm environment. We need focus on renewables |
| Green Social Union | 0 | No | Fossil fuels harm the environment, and if we keep extracting them at increased rates we will be contributing to global warming. Another side-effect would be the faster rate that these resources are depleted, while this bill might provide short-term economic growth, it could lead to economic issues in the future. |
| Homeland Union | 20 | Yes | This is a very good proposal for our economy |
| Pax Americana Proposer | 24 | Yes | No reason given |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 16 | Yes | We support this bill |
| Progressive Reform | 21 | No | This is not a good idea |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Progressive Reform | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“It will harm environment. We need focus on renewables”
“Fossil fuels harm the environment, and if we keep extracting them at increased rates we will be contributing to global warming. Another side-effect would be the faster rate that these resources are depleted, while this bill might provide short-term economic growth, it could lead to economic issues in the future.”
“We support this bill”
“This is a very good proposal for our economy”
“This is not a good idea”