A public broadcaster, municipal water management, and producers paying for their waste will ensure that infrastructure it taken care of and delivered to the people.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Water Supply Ownership |
Private water companies under a price regulator
|
Municipally owned water utilities with regulated tariffs
|
|
| 2 | Waste Management |
Licensed landfill and incineration with basic recycling targets
|
Producers pay for recycling their packaging and products
|
|
| 3 | Public Broadcasting Funding |
No public broadcaster (privatize existing assets; advertising-only market)
|
Limited public broadcaster (news/education remit; funded by small household levy)
|
Party
A Left-wing party dedicated to environmentalism and social democracy.
Core pillars
Attorney General · Age 52
A media-savvy idealist with a streetwise edge, Dakota O'Brien combines sharp political instincts with a relentless ambition to reshape the narrative and climb the ranks.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 138 / 435 seats (31.7%)
Against: 297 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands People's Alliance | 2 | Yes | We agree with this proposal |
| Green Social Union Proposer | 82 | Yes | No reason given |
| Homeland Union | 126 | No | We can´t go with this proposal |
| Pax Americana | 109 | No | we'll get the public broadcaster passed, but in a different bill |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 54 | Yes | We support this proposal ! |
| Progressive Reform | 62 | No | We have changed our stance |
For: 27 / 100 seats (27.0%)
Against: 67 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 6
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands People's Alliance | 0 | Yes | We agree with this proposal |
| Broadlands Social Democrats | 0 | Not voted | |
| Green Social Union Proposer | 14 | Yes | No reason given |
| Homeland Union | 23 | No | We can´t go with this proposal |
| Pax Americana | 29 | No | we'll get the public broadcaster passed, but in a different bill |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 13 | Yes | We support this proposal ! |
| Progressive Reform | 15 | No | We have changed our stance |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bernard Blake | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We have changed our stance”
“This is a good idea to pass”
“we'll get the public broadcaster passed, but in a different bill”
“We support this proposal !”
“We can´t go with this proposal”
“We agree with this proposal”