“These are great moderate measures.”
National Security And Digital Rights Act of 2021
Rationale
Strengthening security, privacy, and social equity requires tighter arms control, ethical AI limits, national service for unity, end to corporate surveillance, and safer digital spaces for all.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arms Exports |
Sell arms with minimal restriction
|
Export only to close allies
|
|
| 2 | Autonomous Weapons Systems |
Permitted with mandatory human control
|
Autonomous systems for defence only
|
|
| 3 | Military Service Policy |
Volunteer professional army
|
National service for those 18-20
|
|
| 4 | Data Privacy & Digital Rights |
Basic data protection (consent required; breach notification; opt-out rights)
|
Ban all personal data collection by private companies
|
|
| 5 | Internet Freedom |
Light-touch regulation (net neutrality; limited takedown orders for serious crime only)
|
Moderate regulation (illegal content removed; platforms must verify age; data rules enforced)
|
1
Arms Exports2
Autonomous Weapons Systems3
Military Service Policy4
Data Privacy & Digital Rights5
Internet FreedomProposer
Party
Socialist Broadlands Union Technocrats
The Socialist Broadlands Union Technocrats forge progress from tradition blending worker power with unshackled industry to build a nation that thrives without apology or limit.
Core pillars
James Miller
Activist · Age 48
The scion of an old-money industrial dynasty, James Miller traded corporate boardrooms for the political stage, wielding inherited wealth and razor-sharp policy acumen to build a reputation as a star speaker and ruthless strategist.
Timeline
-
Draft27 March 2021
-
Vote Open27 March 2021
-
Vote Closed26 May 2021
-
Did Not Become Law26 May 2021
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
House of Representatives
FailedFor: 64 / 435 seats (14.7%)
Against: 292 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 79
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free People Liberals | 0 | Abstain | Article 1 is pretty against to free market. We have a precious military industry and these corps have to sell gun on demand, not country based, or ally based. Our allies has priority eventually but, we are running a government, not friendships. But I can not say no to article 4. |
| Homeland Union | 103 | No | Won't go back in Data Privacy & Digital Rights |
| Pax Americana | 105 | No | again with national service? |
| Progressive Reform | 84 | No | This bill is bad policy in the national service |
| Socialist Broadlands Union Technocrats Proposer | 29 | Yes | No reason given |
| Together - Worker's Alliance | 35 | Yes | These are great moderate measures. |
Senate
FailedFor: 15 / 100 seats (15.0%)
Against: 67 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 18
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free People Liberals | 0 | Abstain | Article 1 is pretty against to free market. We have a precious military industry and these corps have to sell gun on demand, not country based, or ally based. Our allies has priority eventually but, we are running a government, not friendships. But I can not say no to article 4. |
| Homeland Union | 24 | No | Won't go back in Data Privacy & Digital Rights |
| Pax Americana | 24 | No | again with national service? |
| Progressive Reform | 19 | No | This bill is bad policy in the national service |
| Socialist Broadlands Union Technocrats Proposer | 7 | Yes | No reason given |
| Together - Worker's Alliance | 8 | Yes | These are great moderate measures. |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
Presidency
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Homeland Union | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This bill is bad policy in the national service”
“again with national service?”
“Article 1 is pretty against to free market. We have a precious military industry and these corps have to sell gun on demand, not country based, or ally based. Our allies has priority eventually but, we are running a government, not friendships. But I can not say no to article 4.”
“Won't go back in Data Privacy & Digital Rights”