“This is barely tolerable.”
Law and Order Response Bill of 2020
Rationale
These changes prioritize public safety by focusing resources on serious crimes, reducing repeat offenses, and ensuring balanced surveillance while raising criminal responsibility to better protect youth.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Police Powers |
Community policing focused on prevention
|
Focus on highest impact crimes
|
|
| 2 | State Surveillance Powers |
Strict privacy protections (right to encryption; no bulk data collection; facial recognition banned)
|
Targeted surveillance (court order required; independent oversight commissioner)
|
|
| 3 | Age of Criminal Responsibility |
From age 12
|
From age 14
|
1
Police Powers2
State Surveillance Powers3
Age of Criminal ResponsibilityProposer
Party
Pax Americana
We advocate for free trade, growth and democracy under Broadland's hegemony.
Core pillars
Andrew Douglas
Activist · Age 26
At 21, Andrew Douglas emerged as a vocal advocate for sweeping reforms after his viral social media exposes on local corruption, earning both adoration from activists and suspicion from entrenched elites.
Timeline
-
Draft19 December 2020
-
Vote Open19 December 2020
-
Vote Closed17 February 2021
-
Became Law17 February 2021
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
House of Representatives
PassedFor: 321 / 435 seats (73.8%)
Against: 8 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 106
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free People Liberals | 8 | No | Not Agreed. It may abuse the freedom of the people. |
| Homeland Union | 85 | Yes | Good proposal to prevent crimes and for law and order |
| Pax Americana Proposer | 189 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Reform | 34 | Yes | This is a good bill to pass |
| Socialist Broadlands Union Technocrats | 13 | Yes | This is barely tolerable. |
Senate
PassedFor: 64 / 100 seats (64.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 36
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free People Liberals | 0 | No | Not Agreed. It may abuse the freedom of the people. |
| Homeland Union | 8 | Yes | Good proposal to prevent crimes and for law and order |
| Pax Americana Proposer | 46 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Reform | 6 | Yes | This is a good bill to pass |
| Socialist Broadlands Union Technocrats | 4 | Yes | This is barely tolerable. |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
Presidency
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Homeland Union | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Not Agreed. It may abuse the freedom of the people.”
“This is a good bill to pass”
“Good proposal to prevent crimes and for law and order”