Strengthening trade union rights ensures fair wages and safer workplaces by empowering workers to negotiate directly with employers.
This small, single-article law will empower workers to seek out better conditions and just treatment in the workplace directly.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trade Union Rights |
Unions permitted but strikes severely limited (cooling-off periods; binding arbitration)
|
Full collective bargaining and strike rights
|
Party
Forward Broadlands is a progressive, centre-left party committed to building a fairer, more prosperous and more united Broadlands. We believe in strong public services, decent work, opportunity for every community, and an economy that works for ordinary people.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 27
A fast-rising policy wonk with a sharp eye for media narratives, he began as a parliamentary researcher before leveraging his academic rigor and knack for pragmatic solutions into a meteoric rise within the party’s inner circle.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 247 / 435 seats (56.8%)
Against: 145 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 43
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands Democrats | 0 | No | We support workers' rights, but this proposal goes too far and risks undermining economic stability and essential services. |
| Forward Broadlands Proposer | 60 | Yes | No reason given |
| Homeland Union | 60 | No | We cannot agree on this. |
| Pax Americana | 85 | No | the current legislation is fine |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 72 | Yes | Yes, it's a great bill! |
| Progressive Reform | 115 | Yes | This bill is a good idea |
For: 47 / 100 seats (47.0%)
Against: 39 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 14
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands Democrats | 0 | No | We support workers' rights, but this proposal goes too far and risks undermining economic stability and essential services. |
| Forward Broadlands Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Homeland Union | 0 | No | We cannot agree on this. |
| Pax Americana | 39 | No | the current legislation is fine |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 0 | Yes | Yes, it's a great bill! |
| Progressive Reform | 47 | Yes | This bill is a good idea |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Progressive Reform | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This bill is a good idea”
“the current legislation is fine”
“Yes, it's a great bill!”
“We support workers' rights, but this proposal goes too far and risks undermining economic stability and essential services.”
“We cannot agree on this.”