“This bill is a bad idea”
Labor And Land Ownership Reforms of 2024
Rationale
These changes modernize labor market entry and attract foreign investment while balancing youth development and economic growth.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Child Labour Law |
Employment permitted from age 16 with restrictions; no work under 16
|
Light work permitted from age 14; full employment from 16
|
|
| 2 | Foreign Land Ownership |
Ban all foreign ownership of land and property
|
Foreign purchases require government approval
|
1
Child Labour Law2
Foreign Land OwnershipProposer
Party
Homeland Union
The Homeland Union forges strength from tradition and steel to guard our future as one nation under one flag.
Core pillars
Sophia Harding
Activist · Age 55
A working-class retiree from the military, Sophia Harding turned battlefield strategy into political firebrandry, wielding both bullets and soundbites to expose establishment failures with razor-sharp precision.
Timeline
-
Draft21 February 2024
-
Vote Open21 February 2024
-
Vote Closed21 April 2024
-
Did Not Become Law21 April 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
House of Representatives
FailedFor: 85 / 435 seats (19.5%)
Against: 159 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 191
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands Social Democrats | 0 | No | We agree with article 2 but not with article 1 |
| Green Social Union | 0 | No | While Article 2 is a good article, Article 1 would harm workers and as such the GSU opposes this bill. |
| Homeland Union Proposer | 85 | Yes | No reason given |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 68 | No | We are profoundly against this horrible bill |
| Progressive Reform | 91 | No | This bill is a bad idea |
Senate
FailedFor: 20 / 100 seats (20.0%)
Against: 37 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 43
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands Social Democrats | 0 | No | We agree with article 2 but not with article 1 |
| Green Social Union | 0 | No | While Article 2 is a good article, Article 1 would harm workers and as such the GSU opposes this bill. |
| Homeland Union Proposer | 20 | Yes | No reason given |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 16 | No | We are profoundly against this horrible bill |
| Progressive Reform | 21 | No | This bill is a bad idea |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
Presidency
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Progressive Reform | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We are profoundly against this horrible bill”
“We agree with article 2 but not with article 1”
“While Article 2 is a good article, Article 1 would harm workers and as such the GSU opposes this bill.”