Essential services need uninterrupted delivery; privatising key industries boosts efficiency and economic growth for public benefit.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Right to Strike |
Protected with a lawful ballot
|
Banned/limited in essential services
|
|
| 2 | Public Ownership of Key Industries |
Private, with strong regulation
|
Privatise and lightly regulate
|
Party
We advocate for free trade, growth and democracy under Broadland's hegemony.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 26
At 21, Andrew Douglas emerged as a vocal advocate for sweeping reforms after his viral social media exposes on local corruption, earning both adoration from activists and suspicion from entrenched elites.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 145 / 435 seats (33.3%)
Against: 247 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 43
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands Democrats | 0 | No | We support economic growth, but essential services also require fair worker protections and appropriate public oversight. This bill goes too far. |
| Forward Broadlands | 60 | No | This is an evil and vile law that attacks the rights of workers and puts essential services at the mercy of private profit. Banning or restricting the right to strike strips essential workers of one of their most important tools to demand fair treatment, while Pax's new softer regulations risks putting profit before the public good. We must unite against this kind of capitalist nonsense and defend workers, public ownership, and the quality of life of the people of Broadlands. |
| Homeland Union | 60 | Yes | Our industry needs this! |
| Pax Americana Proposer | 85 | Yes | No reason given |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 72 | No | Pax Americana is a totalitarian and f@scist movement! We can't support this bill! |
| Progressive Reform | 115 | No | This infringes on worker rights |
For: 39 / 100 seats (39.0%)
Against: 47 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 14
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands Democrats | 0 | No | We support economic growth, but essential services also require fair worker protections and appropriate public oversight. This bill goes too far. |
| Forward Broadlands | 0 | No | This is an evil and vile law that attacks the rights of workers and puts essential services at the mercy of private profit. Banning or restricting the right to strike strips essential workers of one of their most important tools to demand fair treatment, while Pax's new softer regulations risks putting profit before the public good. We must unite against this kind of capitalist nonsense and defend workers, public ownership, and the quality of life of the people of Broadlands. |
| Homeland Union | 0 | Yes | Our industry needs this! |
| Pax Americana Proposer | 39 | Yes | No reason given |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 0 | No | Pax Americana is a totalitarian and f@scist movement! We can't support this bill! |
| Progressive Reform | 47 | No | This infringes on worker rights |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Progressive Reform | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This infringes on worker rights”
“Our industry needs this!”
“Pax Americana is a totalitarian and f@scist movement! We can't support this bill!”
“We support economic growth, but essential services also require fair worker protections and appropriate public oversight. This bill goes too far.”
“This is an evil and vile law that attacks the rights of workers and puts essential services at the mercy of private profit. Banning or restricting the right to strike strips essential workers of one of their most important tools to demand fair treatment, while Pax's new softer regulations risks putting profit before the public good. We must unite against this kind of capitalist nonsense and defend workers, public ownership, and the quality of life of the people of Broadlands.”