Broadlands
Proposals
Immigration Limitation of 2010

Legislative Bill · Broadlands

Immigration Limitation of 2010

Proposed by NTSDP · fronted by Henrietta Burke

Opened

3 Jan 2010

Voting closes

4 Mar 2010

Chambers

2 legislatures

Articles

1 change

Rationale

Severely limiting immigration protects jobs, reduces strain on public services, and ensures sustainable population growth for long-term economic stability, Statistically wise, it would lower crime rates and gang violence.

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous		Proposed
1	Immigration Quota Policy	Abolish all border controls; free movement for anyone in the world		Severely limited immigration

1

Immigration Quota Policy

Previous law

Abolish all border controls; free movement for anyone in the world

Severely limited immigration

Proposer

Party

NTSDP

A nation fortified by strength, culture, and relentless progress. No compromise.

Core pillars

Henrietta Burke

Activist · Age 39

999 social followers

A rising star in political circles, Henrietta Burke’s electrifying speeches and media savvy make her a formidable force, driven by a fierce idealism that captivates audiences and reshapes public debate.

🎤 Fantastic Speaker 🌟 Idealist 📺 Media Savvy

Timeline

Draft

3 January 2010
Vote Open

3 January 2010
Vote Closed

4 March 2010
Did Not Become Law

4 March 2010

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

House of Representatives

Failed

139Yes 296No 0Not voted 435 seats

For: 139 / 435 seats (32.0%)

Against: 296 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 32.0%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Federalist	0	No	No reason given
Green Social Union	145	No	No reason given
Liberal Freedom	151	No	No reason given
NTSDP Proposer	1	Yes	No reason given
National Conservative Movement	102	Yes	No reason given
Progressive Alliance	0	No	No reason given
Reformed Democratic	36	Yes	No reason given

Senate

Failed

25Yes 73No 2Not voted 100 seats

For: 25 / 100 seats (25.0%)

Against: 73 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 2

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 25.5%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Federalist	0	No	No reason given
Green Social Union	32	No	No reason given
Liberal Freedom	41	No	No reason given
NTSDP Proposer	0	Yes	No reason given
National Conservative Movement	25	Yes	No reason given
Progressive Alliance	0	No	No reason given
Reformed Democratic	0	Yes	No reason given
Empty seats	6	Not voted

Presidency

Failed

0Yes 1No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)

Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Liberal Freedom	1	No	No reason given

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

No votes cast yet.